1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1979.tb13685.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative vagolytic potencies of six muscle relaxants in the rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the degree of twitch blockade required to produce paralysis suitable for surgery or intubation of the trachea is likely to be greater than the degree of vagal block required to produce tachycardia. These problems have been approached by Drane and Evans (1979) who suggested the use of the ratio of the 20% vagal blocking dose to the 80% twitch blocking dose (called the EDayso ratio in this paper). We have used both the ED*) ratio and the ED20/S0 ratio and find that, despite numerical differences between the ratios (tables I and III), when the two ratios for different drugs were compared with that for pancuronium as standard, the relative safety margins of the drugs were similar, no matter which ration was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the degree of twitch blockade required to produce paralysis suitable for surgery or intubation of the trachea is likely to be greater than the degree of vagal block required to produce tachycardia. These problems have been approached by Drane and Evans (1979) who suggested the use of the ratio of the 20% vagal blocking dose to the 80% twitch blocking dose (called the EDayso ratio in this paper). We have used both the ED*) ratio and the ED20/S0 ratio and find that, despite numerical differences between the ratios (tables I and III), when the two ratios for different drugs were compared with that for pancuronium as standard, the relative safety margins of the drugs were similar, no matter which ration was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take account of the different slopes of these dose-inhibition curves, which appear common to most non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents, the results for all compounds have been expressed not only as the ratio of the 50% blocking doses at the cardiac vagus neuroeffector and the neuromuscular junctions, but also as the ratio of the dose producing 20% vagal block to the dose producing 80% neuromuscular blockade. The latter ratio has been regarded as producing a more meaningful guide to the likely occurrence of tachycardia as a result of vagal blockade at muscle paralysing doses (Drane and Evans, 1979). In both cases a vagal: neuromuscular ratio value greater than unity indicates greater neuromuscular blocking potency.…”
Section: Pancuronium Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ED50 values for vagal blockade from vecuronium and atracurium were not significantly different and hence the difference in the vagal/neuromuscular blocking EDJO ratios (table I) reflects purely the greater neuromuscular blocking potency of vecuronium-a factor of around 4. We have also used the EDsvso ratio (table I), which compares the dose producing 20% vagal block with that producing 80% neuromuscular block (Drane and Evans, 1979). This value may give a more meaningful indication of the safety margin from autonomic side-effects at degrees of neuromuscular blockade likely to be used for intubation of the trachea in man (Marshall, Gibb and Durant, 1983).…”
Section: Autonomic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%