The relativistic theory of gravitation

Logunov, A. A.

doi:10.1007/bf01017241

Cited by 43 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In recent literature there is intriguing discussion regarding the physical impossibility of black holes, horizons, and singularities. Logunov 2002 [145]; Logunov & Mestvirishvili [146,147]; Kisilev et al [158]; Mitra [159]; and, Gershtein et al [160] emphasized the important role of additional physical conditions that should be used for a physically reasonable solution of Einstein's equations. For example, the Hilbert's causality principle leads to the elimination of horizons and singularities [160].…”

Section: Geometrical Approach Without Black Holes?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, this way of introducing the energy for the geometrized gravity field within GRT is conceptually inconsistent, as discussed, in detail, by Logunov 2002 [145]; Logunov & Folomeshkin (1977) [137] and Logunov & Mestvirishvili (1989) [146]. Additionally, Yilmaz (1992) [148] has shown that for any pseudo-tensor due to the Freud identity one has ∂ i ( √ −g t i k ) = 0, which leads to a difficulty with the definition of the gravitational acceleration.…”

Section: The Energy-momentum Of the Space Curvature?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Logunov 2002 [145]; Logunov & Mestvirishvili [146,147] developed a field-geometrical gravity theory, called the relativistic theory of gravitation (RTG), where they accept "geometrization principle" for matter, while conserve Minkowski flat space for gravitation field. They introduce the metric tensor g ik of the effective Riemann space, and also accept a "causality principle" as an additional restriction on g ik .…”

Section: Attempts To Overcome the Energy Problem By Using Simultaneously Minkowski And Riemannian Spacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Einstein’s Geometrical versus Feynman’s Quantum-Field Approaches to Gravity Physics: Testing by Modern Multimessenger Astronomy

Baryshev¹

2020

Universe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern multimessenger astronomy delivers unique opportunity for performing crucial observations that allow for testing the physics of the gravitational interaction. These tests include detection of gravitational waves by advanced LIGO-Virgo antennas, Event Horizon Telescope observations of central relativistic compact objects (RCO) in active galactic nuclei (AGN), X-ray spectroscopic observations of Fe Kα line in AGN, Galactic X-ray sources measurement of masses and radiuses of neutron stars, quark stars, and other RCO. A very important task of observational cosmology is to perform large surveys of galactic distances independent on cosmological redshifts for testing the nature of the Hubble law and peculiar velocities. Forthcoming multimessenger astronomy, while using such facilities as advanced LIGO-Virgo, Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), ALMA, WALLABY, JWST, EUCLID, and THESEUS, can elucidate the relation between Einstein’s geometrical and Feynman’s quantum-field approaches to gravity physics and deliver a new possibilities for unification of gravitation with other fundamental quantum physical interactions.

show abstract

Section: Geometrical Approach Without Black Holes?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Energy-momentum Of the Space Curvature?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Attempts To Overcome the Energy Problem By Using Simultaneously Minkowski And Riemannian Spacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Einstein’s Geometrical versus Feynman’s Quantum-Field Approaches to Gravity Physics: Testing by Modern Multimessenger Astronomy

Baryshev¹

2020

Universe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Curvature of spacetime puts in accelerated motion, to a body in rest. General relativity only operationally determines this process through of the geodesic equation (Einstein, 1922) [31]: But, it is a mystery as a metaphysical entity, spacetime, can put at accelerated motion to a physical entity, matter-energy, yet worst that spacetime, that lacks of energy-momentum (Logunov, 1989) [32], can put at accelerated motion, to a body in rest (Van Flandern, 2004) [33].…”

Section: Internal Anomaliesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relativity Current Paradigm with Unresolved Anomalies

Gomez¹

2014

JMP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When a theory, as the general relativity, linked to special relativity, is foundation of a scientific paradigm, through normal science and academy, scientifics, professionals, professors, students and journals of that scientific community, the paradigm, it self-sustains and reproduces. Thus, the research is obligated and limited to apply the model existent of the paradigm to formulate problems and solve them, without searching new discoveries. This self-protection of the paradigm causes it to end its cycle of life, only after a long time, until that arise unresolved anomalies, some presents since origin, that they finally cause its change by other new paradigm. In this work, we study the most important anomalies that are part of the foundations of general relativity with the goal of promoting the call period of transition that is previous to scientific revolution. We use critical analysis method for rereading the general relativity, from the perspective of the history of science and philosophy of science. We find, the structural and complex anomaly of general relativity based on metaphysical spacetime that produces the metaphysics replaces physics. Also, two internal anomalies their direct consequences. These are: matter curves metaphysical spacetime, and metaphysical spacetime determines the geodesic motion of physical matter. We conclude that general relativity has no valid physical concept of spacetime, therefore of gravity. For these reasons, a new paradigm is needed.

show abstract

“…5 A great amount of work in bimetric gravity was done by A.A. Logunov and his collaborators. 6 They have concluded that an introduction of the second space-time metric leads to an appearance of the massive graviton. When the second metric is fixed to be Minkowskian the cosmological equations provide limits for the scale factor, both from below, and from above.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%