“…The construct of identity, or how individuals perceive themselves and engage others as a particular "kind of person" (Gee, 2000, p. 99), has been implicated in research of academic performance, engagement, career choice, and persistence in STEM-related contexts in both formal and informal learning settings (e.g., Carlone and Johnson, 2007;Hazari et al, 2010;Dou et al, 2019;Morris et al, 2019;Avraamidou, 2020;Goff et al;. Identity researchers focusing on undergraduate STEM career choice and persistence have generally explored these factors without accounting for students' post-bachelor degree intentions, instead tending to study students enrolled in particular majors, such as physics (Hazari et al, 2010;Seyranian et al, 2018) or engineering (Godwin et al, 2016), or those pursuing STEM majors in general (Dou and Cian, 2020;Goff et al, 2020). Though this type of research is valuable in understanding students' self-perception within STEM broadly or within specific STEM disciplines, tendencies to define STEM populations by college major restrict the implications and utility of research beyond the major-specific context.…”