War Crimes and the Conduct of Hostilities 2013
DOI: 10.4337/9781781955925.00028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relevance of international humanitarian law in national case law on terrorism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The US Supreme Court decided to apply Common Article 3, as a matter of customary law, to acts related to the 'war on terror' in Iraq, but it refrained from legally qualifying the armed conflict between the US and Al Quaeda under IHL (pp 305-07). Among other national judicial decisions reviewed by Antonino Alì 35 a judgment of the Italian Court of Cassation sentenced a person accused of complicity with terrorist purposes, who had previously been acquitted on the ground that acts of guerrilla warfare perpetrated in armed conflict cannot be prosecuted unless violations of IHL have occurred (pp 300-03).…”
Section: Part V: the Special Case Of Terrorism In Armed Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Supreme Court decided to apply Common Article 3, as a matter of customary law, to acts related to the 'war on terror' in Iraq, but it refrained from legally qualifying the armed conflict between the US and Al Quaeda under IHL (pp 305-07). Among other national judicial decisions reviewed by Antonino Alì 35 a judgment of the Italian Court of Cassation sentenced a person accused of complicity with terrorist purposes, who had previously been acquitted on the ground that acts of guerrilla warfare perpetrated in armed conflict cannot be prosecuted unless violations of IHL have occurred (pp 300-03).…”
Section: Part V: the Special Case Of Terrorism In Armed Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%