2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11017-011-9175-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relevance of Nash equilibrium to psychiatric disorders

Abstract: In game theory, the word 'game' is used to describe any interdependence between interacting parties, and the Nash equilibrium is a prominent tool for analysing such interactions. I argue that the concept of the Nash equilibrium may also be used in non-gaming contexts. An individual is in a Nash equilibrium if his or her beliefs are consistent with his or her actions. Given that discordance between beliefs and behaviour is a typical cause of psychiatric disorders, individuals who are not in a Nash equilibrium a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pronouns, for example, may have been adopted over time because they enable speakers to express meaning to an interlocutor with a very small number of words that are easy to retrieve because they are highly frequent and can be used in most circumstances while minimizing the resources required to repeat a much less frequent noun phrase that is useful in a very limited number of circumstances. Finally, game theory provides a universal framework that quantifies several domains of human behavior, including but not limited to financial decision-making (Sanfey, Rilling, Aronson, Nystrom, & Cohen, 2003), learning (Camerer, 2003), social preferences (Camerer, 2003), mate selection (Miller & Todd, 1998) and psychiatric disorders (Patokos, in press). From this perspective, there is no a priori motivation for hypothesizing that decision-making during language processing is in some way distinct from other domains of human behavior, and we therefore hypothesize that similar decision-making mechanisms support language processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pronouns, for example, may have been adopted over time because they enable speakers to express meaning to an interlocutor with a very small number of words that are easy to retrieve because they are highly frequent and can be used in most circumstances while minimizing the resources required to repeat a much less frequent noun phrase that is useful in a very limited number of circumstances. Finally, game theory provides a universal framework that quantifies several domains of human behavior, including but not limited to financial decision-making (Sanfey, Rilling, Aronson, Nystrom, & Cohen, 2003), learning (Camerer, 2003), social preferences (Camerer, 2003), mate selection (Miller & Todd, 1998) and psychiatric disorders (Patokos, in press). From this perspective, there is no a priori motivation for hypothesizing that decision-making during language processing is in some way distinct from other domains of human behavior, and we therefore hypothesize that similar decision-making mechanisms support language processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Game theory has been employed in psychological studies, for instance, to analyze the influence of a depressive mood on economic decisions modeled by the ultimatum game [10] and to describe psychiatric disorders as Nash disequilibria of the self, reflecting discordances between actions and beliefs [11]. The game introduced here relates investment in formal education to professional success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%