1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00050-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relevance of science and technology indicators: the case of pulp and paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 This bias is similar to the 'S&T perspective that gives too much weight to S&T indicators, especially R&D spending, for understanding technological innovation as discussed by Laestadius ( 1998 ). On the basis of in-depth case studies from the pulp and paper sector in Sweden, he argues that this bias has implied a relative neglect of innovation in, for example, mechanical technologies and other low-and medium-tech areas.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1 This bias is similar to the 'S&T perspective that gives too much weight to S&T indicators, especially R&D spending, for understanding technological innovation as discussed by Laestadius ( 1998 ). On the basis of in-depth case studies from the pulp and paper sector in Sweden, he argues that this bias has implied a relative neglect of innovation in, for example, mechanical technologies and other low-and medium-tech areas.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As our in depth case study suggests, 'the dominant aggregated S&T indicators are of little, if any, relevance for understanding the process of innovativeness, knowledge formation and technical change in industry' (Laestadius 1998, p. 393) except in 'modern' academic-based industries such as IT and pharmaceuticals (Laestadius 1998). However, diffusion of science based generic technologies into traditional and natural resource based activities will further increase these biases and, thus, provide an unrealistic basis for decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…" F E A T U R E S Universities and Technology-based Entrepreneurship in the Gothenburg Region 14 Simplistic classifications of sectors in 'high' and 'low' tech fail to capture the dynamics of some knowledge fields which are relevant in sectors other than 'high tech' (Laestadius, 1998). Fourth, the great differences between electronics and computer engineering in the relationship between firm start-ups and the supply of capabilities (it was five times higher for computer engineering) underscores the negative impact of stagnation in the supply of capabilities in electronics on local technology-based entrepreneurship. This substantial difference may, of course, be argued to reflect greater opportunities for firm formation in computer engineering, but this is not plausible.…”
Section: And Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%