2015
DOI: 10.1109/te.2014.2381599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relevance of Software Development Education for Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Enabling practitioners to develop successful products poses several challenges to SE education research, including fostering current practices in an ever-changing arena and having a clear focus on practical skills [37]. To this end, researchers dedicated considerable effort to mapping software processes to course sessions and deliverables, and to discuss practices, behaviors, and interactions among students [28]. The education of prospective CS/SE experts focuses mostly on fotering abstraction skills that allow students to abstract real-world problems and deliver software products.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enabling practitioners to develop successful products poses several challenges to SE education research, including fostering current practices in an ever-changing arena and having a clear focus on practical skills [37]. To this end, researchers dedicated considerable effort to mapping software processes to course sessions and deliverables, and to discuss practices, behaviors, and interactions among students [28]. The education of prospective CS/SE experts focuses mostly on fotering abstraction skills that allow students to abstract real-world problems and deliver software products.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongest contrast between the two groups shown in Tables IV and V was perceptions on the teaching and assessment structures; with the programming group providing feedback as to how well everything was structured, and the other containing some students claiming that the structure impacted their learning. This contrast could be interpreted to support the literature in terms of self-efficacy and mindset (Tek et al 2018) and the effect that this has on students motivation to learn material of perceived relevance (Lahtinen et al 2005;Liebenberg et al 2015;Shim et al 2017) and at the speed in which they learn (Hutchison-Green et al 2008). While motivation was not measured in the study, the feedback suggests that the flipped learning approach requires students to have academic discipline to learn passive material out of class and for students without the required motivation and interest this could have inhibited their learning.…”
Section: Negative Responsesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Some of the difficulties in learning to program include decomposing a problem into subtasks; reading and understanding code; coming to terms with programming principles and routines; and synthesizing this new knowledge with existing knowledge (Koulouri et al 2015). Such difficulties are even more so when the students find no relevance or interest in their learning, effecting their motivation to learn (Lahtinen et al 2005;Liebenberg et al 2015;Shim et al 2017). In part, this is because students develop domain-specific implicit theories and selfbeliefs, leading students that find value in programming to use feedback to work harder and improve, while students that see little value struggle with the novelty and difficulty impacting their mindset, lowering confidence and approach to practice and learn (Hutchison-Green et al 2008;Tek et al 2018).…”
Section: First Year Programming Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under goal (a), as an important side benefit, the initiative also aims at addressing the gap between the new hires' skill levels and the company's expectations of them. This gap, wellacknowledged in the industry, has been studied and highlighted by several researchers [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%