2000
DOI: 10.1080/713688543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relevance of Systematic Reviews to Educational Policy and Practice

Abstract: This paper argues that educational policy and practice has much to gain from systematic reviews and other methods of research synthesis. Different types of reviews are considered, including narrative reviews, vote-counting reviews, meta-analyses, best evidence synthesis, and meta-ethnography. It is argued that systematic reviews allow researchers, and users of research, to go beyond the limitations of single studies and to discover the consistencies and variability in seemingly similar studies. This, in turn, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
143
0
22

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
143
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, they are used to systematically retrieve research papers from literature databases and analyze them according to a pre-defined research question. Today, systematic reviews are applied across all disciplines, reaching from educational policy [9,10] to innovation research [11]. In our view, a systematic review constitutes an elegant way to start an empirical investigation.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, they are used to systematically retrieve research papers from literature databases and analyze them according to a pre-defined research question. Today, systematic reviews are applied across all disciplines, reaching from educational policy [9,10] to innovation research [11]. In our view, a systematic review constitutes an elegant way to start an empirical investigation.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Una revisión narrativa tiene como propósito esencial identificar el número de escritos producto de investigaciones sobre un objeto de conocimiento o un tema en particular. En este tipo de revisiones no hay necesariamente una estrategia de búsqueda especificada, ni criterios definidos para la (Davies, 2000;Beltran, 2005). En contraste con las revisiones narrativas, las revisiones sistemáticas parten de preguntas específicas de investigación, y consideran estrategias de búsqueda de la información claramente especificadas con criterios de selección de las publicaciones especificados con anterioridad.…”
Section: Revisiones Sistemáticas Y Meta-análisisunclassified
“…Sin embargo, una revisión de la literatura muestra que las posibilidades no se agotan en el planteamiento de esta dicotomía, sino que entre estos dos polos parecen existir varios tipos de revisiones de literatura que gradúan de forma mucho más fina el espectro de estudios. Específicamente, además de los dos anteriores, Davies (2000) señala tres nuevos tipos de revisión: 1) la revisión de conteo de votos, 2) la síntesis de la mejor evidencia, y 3) la llamada meta etnografía.…”
Section: Revisiones Sistemáticas Y Meta-análisisunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Allison and Carey (2007) speak of a hierarchy where the knowledge transfer process is unidirectional emanating from the research sphere to the field practitioners. Cooper (2010) and Davies (2000) speak of two different cultures characterized by the use of different registers and the pursuit of different agendas. Rickson (2005) explains that while, the two groups share the same fundamental concerns related to the understanding of learning processes and the identification and verification of best teaching practices, their problem-solving and knowledge dissemination processes divert considerably in accordance with their respective institutional expectations: researchers value data-driven investigation and prioritize publication while teachers are more likely to share insights gained from classroom experience within their community of practice.…”
Section: A Definition Causes and Repercussions Of The Linkage Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%