The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes 2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781108349406.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relevance of World Englishes for Variationist Sociolinguistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, I wish to look beyond these results and briefly reflect on where the current analysis is situated with regard to the study of discourse markers in world Englishes. While much of the work on discourse‐pragmatic variation and change has focused on Inner Circle Englishes, D'Arcy (2019, p. 452) has recently argued that the global status of English is ‘a critical access point in the development of an empirical theory of language change’, stressing that world Englishes provide an ideal window for examining questions inherent to the variationist enterprise. The ability to gain this sort of insight into longitudinal processes of variation and change, however, relies heavily on producing comparable results from replicable methodologies, a task that is notoriously difficult when studying discourse features (Pichler, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, I wish to look beyond these results and briefly reflect on where the current analysis is situated with regard to the study of discourse markers in world Englishes. While much of the work on discourse‐pragmatic variation and change has focused on Inner Circle Englishes, D'Arcy (2019, p. 452) has recently argued that the global status of English is ‘a critical access point in the development of an empirical theory of language change’, stressing that world Englishes provide an ideal window for examining questions inherent to the variationist enterprise. The ability to gain this sort of insight into longitudinal processes of variation and change, however, relies heavily on producing comparable results from replicable methodologies, a task that is notoriously difficult when studying discourse features (Pichler, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%