2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability and psychometric structure of Multi-Scale Entropy measured from EEG signals at rest and during face and object recognition tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we add to important work to establish the reliability and validity of MSE [63,115,116] and to suggest its validity as a measure of individual differences [116]. However, a limitation to these and the majority of other studies investigating EEG variability metrics to date is the focus on a limited number of manually selected metrics with minimal consideration of alternatives [117].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we add to important work to establish the reliability and validity of MSE [63,115,116] and to suggest its validity as a measure of individual differences [116]. However, a limitation to these and the majority of other studies investigating EEG variability metrics to date is the focus on a limited number of manually selected metrics with minimal consideration of alternatives [117].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid multiple testing, we integrated MSE values across several scales into single scores. This procedure has been previously proposed in the literature as an approach to handle such multiple scale measurements (see Takahashi et al, 2009;Kaur et al, 2019). Hence, we used the area under the curve (AUC) as an integrated entropy score per participant.…”
Section: Latent Mean and Individual Differences In Multiscale Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid multiple testing issues in statistical analyses, we integrated the MSE values across adjacent time scales, following the procedure used in a previous study (Kaur et al, 2019), and calculated areas under the curve (AUCs) of MSE as integrated measures at low (1-5), medium (6-11), and high (12-20) time scales, for each participant and electrode. These composite values of MSE were later used to obtain electrode-specific latent variables (see Section 2.4.1).…”
Section: Mse Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). AUC was calculated according to the procedure proposed by Kaur et al (2019). The length of segments used for calculating MSE indicators was chosen on the basis of prior reliability analyses (see Supplementary Material S1).…”
Section: Discovering Rois For Genetic Associations Of Mse In Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation