2010
DOI: 10.35371/kjoem.2010.22.2.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reliability and Validity of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) for Nurses for the Assessment of Workplace Bullying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
33
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher score translates to more experiences of negative acts in the workplace over the 6-month period. The reliability of this scale was Cronbach a = 0.92 in a study by Nam et al (2010), and for this study, alpha was 0.94. Subscale reliabilities in the present study were 0.93, 0.57, and 0.81, respectively.…”
Section: Workplace Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A higher score translates to more experiences of negative acts in the workplace over the 6-month period. The reliability of this scale was Cronbach a = 0.92 in a study by Nam et al (2010), and for this study, alpha was 0.94. Subscale reliabilities in the present study were 0.93, 0.57, and 0.81, respectively.…”
Section: Workplace Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The reliability of this scale was Cronbach α = 0.92 in a study by Nam et al . (), and for this study, alpha was 0.94. Subscale reliabilities in the present study were 0.93, 0.57, and 0.81, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, face‐to‐face bullying was measured using the Korean version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire‐Revised (NAQ‐R). The original questionnaire was developed by Einarsen, Hole, and Notelaers (), which was translated into Korean by Nam, Kim, Kim, Koo, and Park (). Its reliability and validity among Korean nurses have been verified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their scale development article, Einarsen et al (2009) provide reliability evidence and evidence for the validity of the 22-item measure as an index of the frequency of being a bullying target. Further, two recent studies found evidence of reliability and construct validity in samples in Japan (Takaki et al, 2010), Korea (Nam, Kim, Kim, Koo, & Park, 2010), and Greece (Kakoulakis et al, 2015). For the present study, items were modified in such a manner as to assess the frequency of perpetrating acts of bullying (e.g., "In the past year, how often have you given a person tasks with unreasonable deadlines?").…”
Section: Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%