2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10566-012-9185-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reliability and Validity of the Dominic Interactive: A Computerized Child Report Instrument for Mental Health Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pictures, texts, and voices are used to illustrate abstract emotional and behavioral content of mental health problems and to simplify the scenario for children in primary school. Test-retest and internal consistency reliabilities for the Dominic Interactive (and its cross culture derivatives) were excellent (α between 0.60 and 0.90 (Bidaut Russell et al, 1998; Kuijpers et al, 2013; Murphy et al, 2000; Shojaei et al, 2009; Valla et al, 1994, 1997). In this sample, alphas for specific disorders ranged from 0.70 to 0.94.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pictures, texts, and voices are used to illustrate abstract emotional and behavioral content of mental health problems and to simplify the scenario for children in primary school. Test-retest and internal consistency reliabilities for the Dominic Interactive (and its cross culture derivatives) were excellent (α between 0.60 and 0.90 (Bidaut Russell et al, 1998; Kuijpers et al, 2013; Murphy et al, 2000; Shojaei et al, 2009; Valla et al, 1994, 1997). In this sample, alphas for specific disorders ranged from 0.70 to 0.94.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this sample, alphas for specific disorders ranged from 0.70 to 0.94. Validity of the Dominic Interactive scales is well established (Bergeron et al, 2010; de la Osa et al, 2011; Kuijpers et al, 2013; Valla et al, 2000), including validation in this sample against a clinical instrument (Pez et al, 2011). Probable cases were de termined based on established cut points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Child mental health data was collected from three informants: the child, the parent, and the teacher. Child report was examined using the extensively validated instrument the Dominic Interactive (DI) [ 16 19 ]. The DI is self-administered computer-based questionnaire developed for children ages 6–11.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probable cases of each disorder are determined based on established cut-points. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency analyses indicated that the DI is reliable with Cronbach alphas ranging from .60 to .90 and test-retests ranging from .44 to .75 for each disorder (Bidaut-Russell, Valla, Thomas, Bergeron, & Lawson, 1998; Kuijpers, Otten, Krol, Vermulst, & Engels, 2013; Shojaei & Valla, 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%