1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00421183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of the hole-board apparatus

Abstract: Two aspects of the reliability of the hole-board apparatus were investigated-the similarity between scores of different samples of the same population on their first exposure to the apparatus, and the test-retest reliability. Rats and mice were given a 5-min exposure to the hole-board and then retested for 5 min after 1, 2 or 8 days. Male rats and mice showed good initial exposure reliability, whereas the female mouse groups differed significantly. All animals showed a positive test-retest correlation (range 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies, exposure to a novel environment immediately before testing in the elevated plus maze increases motor activity in the elevated plus maze and a greater likelihood of entering the open arms of the maze 1,25,26 . Although indices of anxiety behavior in the elevated plus maze do not correlate with the amount of exploration in a hole-board 27 , using the hole-board task immediately before elevated plus maze testing can provide additional indices of activity and exploration (i.e., rearing and head dipping) 25,26 , which are independent of plus maze exposure, to rule out changes in open arm exploration being due to changes in general activity and/or exploratory motivation. For instance, this method has been successfully used to demonstrate anxioselectivity of the long-lasting impact of experimental epilepsy on rodents and the impact of predator stress exposure (both experimental situations that can alter activity) on plus maze anxiety 28,29 .…”
Section: Predictive Validity Of the Elevated Plus Mazementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, exposure to a novel environment immediately before testing in the elevated plus maze increases motor activity in the elevated plus maze and a greater likelihood of entering the open arms of the maze 1,25,26 . Although indices of anxiety behavior in the elevated plus maze do not correlate with the amount of exploration in a hole-board 27 , using the hole-board task immediately before elevated plus maze testing can provide additional indices of activity and exploration (i.e., rearing and head dipping) 25,26 , which are independent of plus maze exposure, to rule out changes in open arm exploration being due to changes in general activity and/or exploratory motivation. For instance, this method has been successfully used to demonstrate anxioselectivity of the long-lasting impact of experimental epilepsy on rodents and the impact of predator stress exposure (both experimental situations that can alter activity) on plus maze anxiety 28,29 .…”
Section: Predictive Validity Of the Elevated Plus Mazementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the open field test (OFT), anxious animals remain along the edges of the enclosure 37 , whereas in the light-dark box, anxiety-related behavior is measured as a propensity to remain in the darkened portion of the chamber 38 . Other less commonly used ethological tests include the staircase task 39 , in which anxious mice tend to rear more and climb fewer steps, the elevated alley 40 , in which mice must traverse a partially illuminated rod, and the hole board 41 , in which animals can forage in holes along the floor of the otherwise exposed apparatus.…”
Section: Measuring Anxiety-related Behaviors In Rodentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rears were defined as any instance where the mouse raised itself up on its hind legs, with its forepaws leaving the ground (with the exception of grooming behaviors). Head dips and rears in the hole-board were taken as measures of rodent exploration and activity, respectively (File & Wardill, 1975a;1975b). Mice were considered in the center when all four paws were within the center area defined by white masking tape, and near the wall when all four feet were within the 4 em area between the masking tape and the wall.…”
Section: Modified Hole-boardmentioning
confidence: 99%