2020
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(20)30782-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The REMAR (Rhein-Main-Registry)-Study: Prospective evaluation of oncotype DX® Assay in Addition to Ki-67 for adjuvant treatment decisions in early breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, RS result could identify a small group of patients who might benefit from chemotherapy, although they were initially recommended to not receive it. These findings are highly comparable with the REMAR trial, a multicentric prospective trial that also aimed at characterizing changes in treatment recommendation after the use of Oncotype DX assay [ 17 ]. Both the IRMA and the REMAR trials found that using the RS result leads to a meaningful reduction of chemotherapy use and, with respect to the results of TAILORx and RxPONDER trials, can reduce overtreatment [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, RS result could identify a small group of patients who might benefit from chemotherapy, although they were initially recommended to not receive it. These findings are highly comparable with the REMAR trial, a multicentric prospective trial that also aimed at characterizing changes in treatment recommendation after the use of Oncotype DX assay [ 17 ]. Both the IRMA and the REMAR trials found that using the RS result leads to a meaningful reduction of chemotherapy use and, with respect to the results of TAILORx and RxPONDER trials, can reduce overtreatment [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, contraindications to chemotherapy were only reported in 1/5 (20%) patients. Although the results of IRMA were similar to comparable multicentric studies, the single center approach limits external validity of IRMA [ 17 ]. Another limitation of this study is that follow-up data are not available, and it is therefore not possible to assess how clinicopathologic factors, information on the RS result, and treatment recommendations will impact survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The commercially available 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay (Exact Sciences, Redwood City, CA, USA) is already implemented in clinical routine [13][14][15][16][17]. In a retrospective study from our group, the 21-gene assay was shown to be associated with detection of DTCs in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative EBC [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%