2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09335-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The remoulding of dietary effects on the fecundity / longevity trade-off in a social insect

Abstract: Background In many organisms increased reproductive effort is associated with a shortened life span. This trade-off is reflected in conserved molecular pathways that link nutrient-sensing with fecundity and longevity. Social insect queens apparently defy the fecundity / longevity trade-off as they are both, extremely long-lived and highly fecund. Here, we have examined the effects of a protein-enriched diet on these life-history traits and on tissue-specific gene expression in a termite species… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 91 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because Odontotermes sp.2, M. bellicosus and C. secundus have available RNAseq data (published or in-house: Elsner et al 2018, Harrison et al 2018, Monroy Kuhn et al 2019, Lin et al 2021, Rau et al 2023, genome assemblies of these three species were annotated with the Braker3 (v. 3.0.3) pipeline (Gabriel et al 2023). Genome assemblies were first softmasked with RepeatMasker (Smit et al 2013(Smit et al -2015 (see Repeat and transposable element annotation).…”
Section: Genome Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Odontotermes sp.2, M. bellicosus and C. secundus have available RNAseq data (published or in-house: Elsner et al 2018, Harrison et al 2018, Monroy Kuhn et al 2019, Lin et al 2021, Rau et al 2023, genome assemblies of these three species were annotated with the Braker3 (v. 3.0.3) pipeline (Gabriel et al 2023). Genome assemblies were first softmasked with RepeatMasker (Smit et al 2013(Smit et al -2015 (see Repeat and transposable element annotation).…”
Section: Genome Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%