2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The renewal effect in fear conditioning with aversive facial expression and negative sentences as unconditioned stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of group on extinction were observed only in data 2 (data 1: BFs < 0.40; data2: BFs < 2.34), and a simple effect analysis indicated that a contextual change promotes the rate of extinction. In summary, acquisition and extinction were achieved in both groups, and a contextual change following acquisition affected extinction only in Data 2 (see also Nihei et al, 2021a;2021b).…”
Section: Acquisition and Extinction In Fear Conditioning With Humansmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effects of group on extinction were observed only in data 2 (data 1: BFs < 0.40; data2: BFs < 2.34), and a simple effect analysis indicated that a contextual change promotes the rate of extinction. In summary, acquisition and extinction were achieved in both groups, and a contextual change following acquisition affected extinction only in Data 2 (see also Nihei et al, 2021a;2021b).…”
Section: Acquisition and Extinction In Fear Conditioning With Humansmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…n = 63;Nihei et al, 2021a) and 2 (n = 64;Nihei et al, 2021b) were obtained from fear conditioning experiments with undergraduates and graduates using neutral faces designated as CSs (CS+ and CS-) and movie stimuli consisting of disgusted faces with insults designated as US. During the acquisition phase (nine trials), CS+ was always paired with US, while CS-was never paired with US.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty-four graduate and undergraduate psychology students (46 female) with a mean age of 20.38 years (SD = 2.26, range: 18-27) participated in this experiment. The sample size was determined by a prior power analysis (f = 0.25, α= 0.95, β= 0.80, correlation among repeated measures = 0.38) based on our previous study (Nihei et al, 2021) using G*Power 3.1 (Faul, Erdfelder, Buchner, & Lang, 2009). Although the result indicated to be necessary for 60 participants to detect the effect, the number of participants was determined to be 64 to equalize the type of stimuli used in each group by counterbalance.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All stimuli were the same as those used by Nihei et al (2021). The neutral faces of two actors (male and female) served as CS + or CS-and three movies of a negative comment ("Go away!"…”
Section: Apparatus and Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation