2016
DOI: 10.1080/02670844.2016.1155008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The repeated spherical indentation test: an efficient way to evaluate the adhesion of hard coatings

Abstract: Fatigue failure of hard coatings usually occurs at much lower loads than failure under static loading. Hence one way to evaluate coating adhesion should be cyclic loading close to service conditions. In this study, a new method of adhesion measurement for hard coatings is introduced based on interfacial fatigue under repeated indentation. Mono-and multi-layered coatings with different interfacial states are evaluated by a repeated-indentation test. Detachment of the coatings occurs initially at the rim of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Torres and co-workers have noted that, by switching from sharp to blunter spherical indenters, there is an intrinsic suitability for examining damage evolution in bulk materials as a function of number of cycles [40] and it is possible to assess fatigue sensitivity. Qiu and coworkers have argued that very large radius probes are less suited for coating systems as the peak stresses are well into the substrate [41][42]. They, therefore, developed a repeated indentation test using a 200-micron radius probe and applied loads in the range 90-300 N.…”
Section: Tinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Torres and co-workers have noted that, by switching from sharp to blunter spherical indenters, there is an intrinsic suitability for examining damage evolution in bulk materials as a function of number of cycles [40] and it is possible to assess fatigue sensitivity. Qiu and coworkers have argued that very large radius probes are less suited for coating systems as the peak stresses are well into the substrate [41][42]. They, therefore, developed a repeated indentation test using a 200-micron radius probe and applied loads in the range 90-300 N.…”
Section: Tinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the test was not fully instrumented, so that it was necessary to stop it to observe deformation, they were able to show enhanced sensitivity to differences in adhesion strength due to changing interlayers [41][42].…”
Section: Tinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Figure 5, the ALD film has higher hardness as compared to Al 2 O 3 films prepared by electron-beam evaporation (EBE) and reactive magnetron sputtering (RMS) [18, 19]. In addition, the deposition temperature affects the mechanical properties of ALD Al 2 O 3 film [20]. Indeed, the films deposited at 177 and 200°C had good mechanical properties, and their hardness was close to γ-Al 2 O 3 [19], indicating that atoms in the films were closely arranged.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the evolution of the friction coefficient recorded during the wear test as a function of the sliding time for Coatings A (no GO) and B (add GO) under a normal load of 50 N. As shown in this figure, the friction coefficients of both coatings rapidly increased during the initial running-in phase, which is believed to be the result of a transition in the contact conditions from two-body abrasion to interfacial sliding [18]. A significant difference can be observed: Coating A (no GO) showed a broader and more pronounced running-in phase that lasted for 300 s, after which a steady-state friction coefficient of μ A ≈ 0.63 was obtained, whereas the transition from the running-in phase to the steady-state phase for Coating B (add GO) was not obvious, and the running-in phase lasted only approximately 100 s before a steady-state friction coefficient of μ B ≈ 0.5 was obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%