2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2010.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reporting quality, scientific rigor, and ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine compound formulations and the differences between Chinese and non-Chinese trials

Abstract: The data indicate that the reporting quality of the included trials on TCM compounds has improved over time, but still remains poor regardless of Chinese or non-Chinese trials. Across all trials, particularly Chinese trials, the reporting of the CONSORT items was inadequate (39.7%). The difference in the mean number of the reported CONSORT items between Chinese trials and non-Chinese trials narrowed from phase 1 (10.0 vs 13.8) to phase 3 (14.4 vs 17.4). Moreover, a large number of trials, especially non-Chines… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this trend does reflect editorial interest of higher ranking journals on conventional care (Turner et al, 2013) and possibility concerns over quality of primary studies (Shang et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Zhong et al, 2010Zhong et al, , 2011, methodological shortcomings among the included MA could be another reason for their lower IF (Fleming et al, 2014). While it is acknowledged that IF is only one of the indicators reflecting research quality, our results demonstrated that MA on CHM trials should improve in these areas: first, protocol of non-Cochrane MA should be registered and published in PROSPERO, such that editors, peer reviewers and users of MA can directly assess the possibility of reporting bias (Booth et al, 2012).…”
Section: Table 4bmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While this trend does reflect editorial interest of higher ranking journals on conventional care (Turner et al, 2013) and possibility concerns over quality of primary studies (Shang et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Zhong et al, 2010Zhong et al, , 2011, methodological shortcomings among the included MA could be another reason for their lower IF (Fleming et al, 2014). While it is acknowledged that IF is only one of the indicators reflecting research quality, our results demonstrated that MA on CHM trials should improve in these areas: first, protocol of non-Cochrane MA should be registered and published in PROSPERO, such that editors, peer reviewers and users of MA can directly assess the possibility of reporting bias (Booth et al, 2012).…”
Section: Table 4bmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Chinese herbal medicine has been widely used to treat colds in China for a long time and has gradually been accepted and applied in many other countries. However, evidence-based efficacy and safety data on Chinese herbs are limited, because the studies have used small sample sizes or are of poor quality [26]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unregulated landscape can be seen in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical trials, where over 60% of studies did not adhere to the standard Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials requirements [28]. Training on proper record keeping and informed consent processes must therefore be rigorous and strictly implemented in order for Chinese hospitals and CROs to be competitive for domestic and international drug development.…”
Section: Scientific and Technical Considerations In Research And Clinmentioning
confidence: 99%