1992
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1992.10543369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Representation of Women's Roles in Women's Magazines Over the Past 30 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are generally supported by Sullivan & O'Connor (1988) who investigated women's role portrayal in magazines from 1958 to 1983. Similar observations were made by Demarest & Garner (1992). Ford et al (1991) have also pointed out how traditional female stereotypes, particularly those relating women and domesticity, continued well into the 1980s.…”
Section: Gendersupporting
confidence: 49%
“…These findings are generally supported by Sullivan & O'Connor (1988) who investigated women's role portrayal in magazines from 1958 to 1983. Similar observations were made by Demarest & Garner (1992). Ford et al (1991) have also pointed out how traditional female stereotypes, particularly those relating women and domesticity, continued well into the 1980s.…”
Section: Gendersupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Although there are a number of studies that explore the representation of women in media (e.g., Barthel, 1988;Scott, 1993) and in magazines in particular (e.g., Andreasen & Steves, 1983;Busby & Leichty, 1993;Demarest & Garner, 1992;Murphy, 1994;Prusank, Duran, & DeLillo, 1993;Walsh, 1999), there is little empirical research focusing on the depiction of mothers. Kaplan's (1990Kaplan's ( , 1992 psychoanalytic feminist analysis of mothers in 1980s popular culture found that the representation of mothers perpetuates patriarchal norms by separating female sexuality, work, and motherhood into distinct spheres: Female sexuality and work are still constructed as threats to the construction of the ideal mother.…”
Section: Maternal Double Bindsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of discussion of work/family issues or even articles balancing personal interests, volunteerism, or public-sphere issue involvement with the care of children presents an illusion that at-home mothers do not experience the "fundamental ambivalence of motherhood" identified 30 years ago by Rich (1976) and more recently reiterated in popular press books by Wolfe (2001) and Crittenden (2001). Walsh (1999) and Demarest and Garner (1992) noted that the paucity of substantive issues in women's magazines and the limited change in magazines' representations of women's roles over time may be due to the advertising-dependent and consumer-oriented nature of general interest magazines. However, the absence of articles and messages empowering mothers to be involved in public-sphere issues that affect them as women and mothers seems to be less a threat to consumerism than a threat to patriarchy.…”
Section: Success/failure Themementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women were portrayed as being dependent on men, uninvolved in important decisions, belonging only in their homes, and Asian Journal of Communication 353 primarily as sexual objects (Courtney & Lockeretz, 1971;Loughlin, 1981). Even though the stereotypical representation of women decreased with the gender-related developments in society (Demarest & Garner, 1992;Dow, 1996;Hovland, McMahan, Lee, Hwang, & Kim, 2005), to the present women are still subordinated to men in more subtle aspects of advertisements (Eisend, 2010;Furnham & Paltzer, 2010;Lindner, 2004;Mager & Helgeson, 2011). The lagging rate of media portrayal of women is especially prominent in Asia.…”
Section: Media Content and Social Changementioning
confidence: 93%