2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The research on the status, rehabilitation, education, vocational development, social integration and support services related to intellectual disability in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A national survey conducted in 2006 sampled %2.5 million people and yielded an ID prevalence rate of 0.75% (Wu, Qiu, Wong, Hernandez & Zhao, 2010). This rate is comparable with international prevalence estimates (Maulik, Mascarenhas, Mathers, Dua, & Saxena, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A national survey conducted in 2006 sampled %2.5 million people and yielded an ID prevalence rate of 0.75% (Wu, Qiu, Wong, Hernandez & Zhao, 2010). This rate is comparable with international prevalence estimates (Maulik, Mascarenhas, Mathers, Dua, & Saxena, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This could arise from cardiac dysfunction with neurological impairment. Most of our aetiologies were reported in previous survey either in national based data collection or hospital survey (Masri et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2010). But one could notice the absence of data on Down syndrome which is probably ruled out during pregnancy screening.…”
Section: Etiologies Of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There was also a smaller proportion of malnutrition, but causes due to birth injury/asphyxia and encephalopathy had increased [11 ]. As most of the economic growth in recent years occurs in cities, many rural areas in China remain poor and deprived.…”
Section: Etiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Second National Sampling Survey on Disability (2006)(2007) also showed that children and adolescents with intellectual disability were the age groups who had received the least services and support compared with adults. Only 35.3% and 54.2% of children aged 0-9 and 10-19 years had received some form of medical services or rehabilitation training, respectively [11 ].…”
Section: Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation