2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02318-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The research output of rod-cone dystrophy genetics

Abstract: Non-syndromic rod-cone dystrophy (RCD) is the most common condition in inherited retinal diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the research output and productivity related to RCD genetics per countries as classified by the human development index (HDI), by analyzing publication frequency and citations, the choice of journals and publishers, since 2000 to date. We have also analyzed the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in publications originating from countries with different HDIs. One thousand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work validated the NGS-detected CNVs [31], emphasizing the diagnostic value of this tool for identifying structural abnormalities in many diseases including RCD. These outcomes emphasize the value of functional assays, such as qPCR, as a diagnostic tool for validating NGS-detected CNVs, increasing the molecular diagnosis rate and thus allowing improved management and better genetic counseling afterward [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work validated the NGS-detected CNVs [31], emphasizing the diagnostic value of this tool for identifying structural abnormalities in many diseases including RCD. These outcomes emphasize the value of functional assays, such as qPCR, as a diagnostic tool for validating NGS-detected CNVs, increasing the molecular diagnosis rate and thus allowing improved management and better genetic counseling afterward [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 In research, rod-cone dystrophy is either referred to as a form of RP or vice versa, or the terms are used synonymously. 29 , 32 , 33 Clinically, RP is preferred and will be used here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%