The research–policy–deliberation nexus: a case study approach

Abstract

BackgroundDecision-makers tend to make connections with researchers far too late in the game of public policy, expecting to find a retail store in which researchers are busy filling shop-front shelves with a comprehensive set of all possible relevant studies that a decision-maker might some day drop by to purchase. This linear type of relation between research and policy needs to be replaced by a more interactive model that facilitates both researchers obtaining a better understanding of policy processes and policymakers being more aware and involved in the conceptualisation and conduct of research. This paper explores the role of governance in facilitating the research–policy nexus, testing a typology of research utilisation based on Murray’s (Soc Policy Society 10(4):459–70, 2011) analysis that considers various degrees of researcher–policymaker deliberation in decision-making processes. The projects were all part of various evaluation efforts carried out by the researchers to explore the use of governance in health promotion activities.MethodsThree case studies were chosen to provide some specific examples that illustrate each level of Murray’s typology. The examples involve intersectoral health promotion collaborations that combine evidence-based research in health policy initiatives with various levels of researcher involvement. For all three projects, interview data was collated in the same way, coded thematically and analysed to consider the relationship between researchers and policymakers.ResultsComparing the three models and their applicability to health promotion interventions, it could be observed that all programmes demonstrated successful examples of research translation. Strong governance imperatives structuring relationships led to more successful outcomes, whereby research was successfully translated into a public policy initiative that also led to improved health outcomes. The key idea across all of these models was that strong governance arrangements mitigated some of the barriers evidenced by the varying degrees of deliberation and researcher involvement in processes.ConclusionsThe paper demonstrates that successful research utilisation is related to strong governance agendas and that early and ongoing involvement of relevant decision-makers and researchers in the governance processes, that is both the conceptualisation and conduct of a study, tend to be the best predictors of success.

Aligning the times: Exploring the convergence of researchers, policy makers and research evidence in higher education policy making

“…Different types of research evidence are underpinned by specific epistemologies and methods that policy actors may interpret as having more or less legitimacy. Research evidence is not always coherent, self-evident, uncontested (Brooy and Kelaher, 2017) or, as we will argue, timely. If and when research evidence is available arguably precedes the questions of how and what.…”

“You Can’t Look at an Orange and Draw a Banana”: Using Research Evidence to Develop Relevant Health Policy in Ghana

“…For research producers (RPs) and PMs to find some synergy and thus facilitate the transition from research to policy, researchers should understand the mechanics of the decision-making process, just as PMs need to have an understanding of the conceptual basis of the research process. 4 La Brooy and Kelaher 4 note that getting research evidence into practice is not like shelving products in a retail shop and expecting prospective buyers to pluck them off the shelves—there must be interactive engagement between RPs and PMs. However, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face particular challenges with this process, including limited access to evidence, the exclusion of PMs and implementers from setting the research agenda, weak health care systems, and limited PM capacity to interpret research findings.…”

The how and why of producing policy relevant research: perspectives of Australian childhood obesity prevention researchers and policy makers

“…Involvement of decision makers in co-creation of research has been linked to improvements in the relevance and use of research [ 11 , 21 , 22 ]. Interactive modes of knowledge production may facilitate appreciation and utilisation of research by decision makers and enhance researchers’ understanding of policy processes [ 21 , 22 ]. Such models have been adopted by funding bodies, who are increasingly requiring health research proposals to include partnerships with decision makers [ 11 ].…”