2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(12)60053-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The research progress in the alkali-free surfactant-polymer combination flooding technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, alkali injection also generates in situ surfactants from the naphthenic acids of crude oil (Johnson 1976). However, application of alkali is not free of problems and challenges such as scaling and production of highly stable emulsions (Zhu et al 2012).…”
Section: Alkali-surfactant Floodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, alkali injection also generates in situ surfactants from the naphthenic acids of crude oil (Johnson 1976). However, application of alkali is not free of problems and challenges such as scaling and production of highly stable emulsions (Zhu et al 2012).…”
Section: Alkali-surfactant Floodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the problems mentioned above, several surfactant-polymer flooding free of alkali pilot tests have been carried out in some China's oil fields, such as Shengli, Dagang and Henan (Zhu et al 2012). The key for the surfactant-polymer flooding is to find a well-performed surfactant that could reduce the interfacial tension between oil and water to ultra-low values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, four production Wells originally used for first polymer flooding wells locate in the main streamline of polymer flooding well pattern and the water cut rises from 92.6% before the field test to 95.7%, another 12 wells originally used for water flooding wells locate in the distributary streamline of polymer flooding well pattern and the water cut of four central wells decreases from 96.5% before the field test to 90.5% and the water cut of another 8 edge wells decreases from 95.5% before the field test to 92.4% (Seen in Fig.13). A better development effect has been seen in the production wells located at distributary streamline, its average single well accumulative oil increase is 1788t more than that of production wells located at main streamline, so remaining oil distribution are the main factor influencing on the development effect after polymer flooding [25][26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Remaining Oil Distribution After Polymer Flooding Is a Majormentioning
confidence: 99%