1996
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140210017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Residency Review Committee for Ophthalmology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With input from the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology, the ACGME and Review Committee set the required minimum number of procedures for graduating ophthalmology residents. 16 Minima have been established in multiple categories of ophthalmic procedures as indicators of adequate experience, but are not considered as indicators of technical competence or requirements for resident graduation. A poor correlation between case volume in training and surgical ability has been reported in general surgery, 17 and the volume of procedures performed may be less important than the quality of teaching during such operations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With input from the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology, the ACGME and Review Committee set the required minimum number of procedures for graduating ophthalmology residents. 16 Minima have been established in multiple categories of ophthalmic procedures as indicators of adequate experience, but are not considered as indicators of technical competence or requirements for resident graduation. A poor correlation between case volume in training and surgical ability has been reported in general surgery, 17 and the volume of procedures performed may be less important than the quality of teaching during such operations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%