2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2010.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The residential demand for electricity in Japan: An examination using empirical panel analysis techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For Israel, our estimates vary between 0.7 and 1 and are higher than the range (0.21-0.59) reported in Beenstock et al (1999) (using household aggregate data). For Japan, our estimates again vary substantially across functional forms, at 0.38 and 0.77, and are lower than the estimate of 1.3 reported in Nakajima (2010) (using prefecture-level aggregate data) but are comparable to those in the prior literature (Nakajima, 2010, Table 1), which lie between 0.37 and 0.47.…”
Section: Comparison To Prior Literaturecontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…For Israel, our estimates vary between 0.7 and 1 and are higher than the range (0.21-0.59) reported in Beenstock et al (1999) (using household aggregate data). For Japan, our estimates again vary substantially across functional forms, at 0.38 and 0.77, and are lower than the estimate of 1.3 reported in Nakajima (2010) (using prefecture-level aggregate data) but are comparable to those in the prior literature (Nakajima, 2010, Table 1), which lie between 0.37 and 0.47.…”
Section: Comparison To Prior Literaturecontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The study finds that in the long‐run residential demand for electricity is price elastic and income inelastic. Using Japanese panel data, Nakajima () examined residential demand for electricity in Japan as a function of the disposable income per household and the overall unit price of electricity for general consumers. The results from the empirical panel analysis techniques suggest that the price effect is negative and elastic while the income effect is inelastic.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical findings provide support for stable short‐ and long‐run relationships. Among other demand models are Nakajima (), who examines the residential demand for electricity in Japan. The results show that price is elastic whereas income inelastic.…”
Section: Electricity Demand Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%