The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders

Kalisch, Raffaël; Baker, Dewleen G.; Basten, Ulrike; Boks, Marco P.; Bonanno, George A.; Brummelman, Eddie; Chmitorz, Andrea; Fernández, Guillén; Fiebach, Christian J.; Galatzer‐Levy, Isaac R.; Geuze, Elbert; Groppa, Sergiu; Helmreich, Isabella; Hendler, Talma; Hermans, Erno J.; Jovanović, Tanja; Kubiak, Thomas; Lieb, Klaus; Lutz, Beat; Müller, Marianne B.; Murray, Ryan J.; Nievergelt, Caroline M.; Reif, Andreas; Roelofs, Karin; Rutten, Bart P. F.; Sander, David; Schick, Anita; Tüscher, Oliver; Diest, Ilse Van; Harmelen, Anne‐Laura van; Veer, Ilya M.; Vermetten, Eric; Vinkers, Christiaan H.; Wager, Tor D.; Walter, Henrik; Wessa, Michèle; Wibral, Michael; Kleim, Birgit

doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0200-8

Cited by 557 publications

(659 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

602

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the newest frameworks suggest that resilient functioning comprises good mental health and/or psychological functioning (Kalisch et al, 2017). Thus resilient functioning after CM should capture functioning across social, emotional, cognitive, and/or affective domains.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Importantly, resilience refers to the process of adaptation following adversity, which can only be measured after the fact in the form of resilient functioning at a given time point or as a given trajectory (Kalisch et al, 2017). As part of an international consortium, we recently defined resilience as "an outcome of good mental health following an adverse life event or a period of adversity" (Kalisch et al, 2017), and we adopt this definition here.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A. Walsh et al, 2010), but in psychiatry, resilience predominantly refers to a positive outcome or adaptation after adversity (G. A. Bonanno, Wortman, & Nesse, 2004;Dante Cicchetti, 2013;Kalisch et al, 2017;Michael Rutter, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As part of an international consortium, we recently defined resilience as "an outcome of good mental health following an adverse life event or a period of adversity" (Kalisch et al, 2017), and we adopt this definition here.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The complex neurobiology of resilient functioning after child maltreatment

Ioannidis¹,

Askelund²,

Kievit³

et al. 2016

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Childhood Maltreatment (CM) has been associated with significant impairment of social, emotional and behavioural functioning in later life. Nevertheless, some individuals who have experienced CM seem to function better than expected. Here, we provide an integrated understanding of the complex interrelated mechanisms that facilitate such resilient functioning after CM. We show that resilient functioning after CM may be characterized by improved reward, emotion, and stress processing in MPFC and Limbic regions, lower cortisol and inflammatory responses, poly-genetic influences, and supportive environments. As these factors are inextricably intertwined, future resilience studies should investigate multiple levels of biological organization and their temporal dynamics. We further provide a method for such studies to appropriately quantify resilient functioning as functioning across multiple domains conditional on the severity of CM experiences. We hope that our perspective fuels further research in the complex neurobiological mechanisms that facilitate resilient functioning after CM.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The complex neurobiology of resilient functioning after child maltreatment

Ioannidis¹,

Askelund²,

Kievit³

et al. 2016

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A further aspect relates to the functionality and utility of resources, which should be helpful in achieving personal motives and goals (Trösken & Grawe, ). The functionality of resources additionally plays a role in the context of coping, with resources being regarded as resilience factors that help to maintain or quickly recover mental health during and after exposure to stressful life circumstances (Kalisch et al, ).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of resources in the face of psychopathology

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The current study compared resource realization and psychological distress in patients with different psychiatric diagnoses and healthy individuals and examined the moderating effect of intrapersonal resources (personal strengths) and interpersonal resources (relationships) on the association between incongruence (unsatisfactory realization of personal goals) and psychological distress. Method In total, 218 participants (45.87% female, mean age = 39.83 years) completed standardized questionnaires at one measurement point. Results Healthy individuals (n = 56) reported the most resources, followed by patients with psychotic (n = 53), substance use (n = 53), and depressive disorders (n = 56). While patients with psychotic disorders benefited from intra‐ and interpersonal resources, patients with depression only benefitted from intrapersonal resources. Patients with substance use disorders did not benefit from resources at all. Conclusions Depending on the diagnosis, patients evaluated their level of resources differently and benefitted in different ways. The results suggest that within psychotherapy, it might be useful to strengthen resources, especially for patients with depressive and substance use disorders.

show abstract