2018
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.08.020602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The resilience of integrated community case management in acute emergency: a case study from Unity State, South Sudan

Abstract: BackgroundAn active conflict in South Sudan in late 2013/early 2014 displaced approximately 2 million people over the course of several months. In May 2015, the International Rescue Committee and UNICEF conducted a mixed-methods case study of the impact of that acute emergency on integrated community case management (iCCM) of childhood illness programming in Payinjiar County, Unity State. The objective was to document the operations of an iCCM program during an acute crisis and to assess the program’s ability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the empirical studies identified differed in terms of their disciplinary tradition or conceptual background. Studies from the public health sciences tended to converge in three groups: (1) quantitative studies focusing on service delivery, making use of service utilization indicators provide an easily accessible measure to assess resilience before, during and after a crisis ( Paterson et al 2014 ; Gizelis et al 2017 ; Sochas et al 2017 ; Kozuki et al 2018 ; Ray-Bennett et al 2019 ), (2) qualitative studies focusing on the health workforce, influenced by ideas of ‘everyday resilience’ and addressing the contributions of social connectedness and leadership on health system resilience ( Mash et al 2008 ; Witter et al 2017 ; Raven et al 2018 ; Brooke-Sumner et al 2019 ; Thude et al 2019 ), and (3) studies taking a broad perspective of health system resilience, looking at multiple health system building blocks or aspects of a health system to assess resiliency ( Ager et al 2015 ; Ammar et al 2016 ; Fukuma et al 2017 ; Ling et al 2017 ; Meyer et al 2018 ; Watts et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the empirical studies identified differed in terms of their disciplinary tradition or conceptual background. Studies from the public health sciences tended to converge in three groups: (1) quantitative studies focusing on service delivery, making use of service utilization indicators provide an easily accessible measure to assess resilience before, during and after a crisis ( Paterson et al 2014 ; Gizelis et al 2017 ; Sochas et al 2017 ; Kozuki et al 2018 ; Ray-Bennett et al 2019 ), (2) qualitative studies focusing on the health workforce, influenced by ideas of ‘everyday resilience’ and addressing the contributions of social connectedness and leadership on health system resilience ( Mash et al 2008 ; Witter et al 2017 ; Raven et al 2018 ; Brooke-Sumner et al 2019 ; Thude et al 2019 ), and (3) studies taking a broad perspective of health system resilience, looking at multiple health system building blocks or aspects of a health system to assess resiliency ( Ager et al 2015 ; Ammar et al 2016 ; Fukuma et al 2017 ; Ling et al 2017 ; Meyer et al 2018 ; Watts et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Kozuki et al (2018) use a process evaluation methodology to document the ability of an integrated community case management programme to continue operation during the active conflict of 2013 and 2014 in South Sudan. The authors use routine programme data, including reporting, supervision, contact, treatment and referral rates, as well as interviews and focus groups with key stakeholders to evaluate the programme’s resiliency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task shifting and contingency plans enable TFPs to continue their activities although with delays. Allocating tasks to lower-level health care providers and CHWs are proving an effective strategy to increase access to service not only in resource poor countries [30], but also in humanitarian settings [31][32][33] and during major epidemics [34]. A major challenge of such a decentralized effort identified in crisis settings [32,34], but applicable to the Kivu as well, is ensuring continuous access to essential medicines to CHWs, as supply chains often struggle to reach health centers.…”
Section: Availability Of Rmncah+n Services In North and South Kivumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high burden of these illnesses in humanitarian settings, there is a need to assess the feasibility of implementing iCCM in these complex environments. Studies on iCCM and other community-based maternal, newborn, and child health services in emergency settings have shown that CHWs can continue providing routine services and can improve emergency response if they are adequately supported [ 12 - 17 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%