Assembling Neoliberalism 2017
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-58204-1_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Resilient Subject

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But resilient subjects are not simply new versions of the individualised subjects imagined by neoliberalism; they are not the entrepreneurialised rational subjects that drive both production and consumption, nor are they reducible to the geneticised subjects imagined by neuroscience and behavioural economics (Cretney and Bond, 2014; McRobbie, 2020). Resilient subjects are ‘situated, mutable and dynamic’, called into being by different imaginaries of the present and future and the tactics and strategies deployed to intervene and govern them (Hill and Larner, 2017). Resilient subjects are also imagined as self-sustaining, collectivised, creators of ‘everyday utopias’ (Cooper, 2013) who in doing so create alternative environmental, economic and social futures.…”
Section: Geographies Of Resistance Resilience and Reworkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But resilient subjects are not simply new versions of the individualised subjects imagined by neoliberalism; they are not the entrepreneurialised rational subjects that drive both production and consumption, nor are they reducible to the geneticised subjects imagined by neuroscience and behavioural economics (Cretney and Bond, 2014; McRobbie, 2020). Resilient subjects are ‘situated, mutable and dynamic’, called into being by different imaginaries of the present and future and the tactics and strategies deployed to intervene and govern them (Hill and Larner, 2017). Resilient subjects are also imagined as self-sustaining, collectivised, creators of ‘everyday utopias’ (Cooper, 2013) who in doing so create alternative environmental, economic and social futures.…”
Section: Geographies Of Resistance Resilience and Reworkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of societal security, resilience and neoliberal security mechanisms, along with the connections between them, need to be further contextualized so that we can apprehend the lack of resistance they induce and the associated social technologies (Krüger, 2018; Hill and Larner, 2017). Vaughan Higgins and Wendy Larner argue in this respect that instead of theorizing a monolithic understanding of neoliberal rule, it is increasingly important ‘to grasp the geographical and temporal unevenness of the processes involved’ (Higgins and Larner, 2017: 2).…”
Section: Societal Security and Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way responsibilities for education, health, welfare, security and mutual care become the responsibility of the individual rather than the state. (Bansel, 2007: 285)As part of this responsibilization, individuals have to deal with significant amounts of uncertainty – something that is, in neo-liberalism, positive, a necessary and desirable component of the free market system (Friedman, 1982), which individuals must respond to and cope with by being resilient (Hill and Larner, 2017). Further, any inequalities are both a positive reflection of the functioning of the market and aspects that will be corrected by the market (Bonanno, 2017).…”
Section: Neo-liberalism In Higher Education and Approaches And Resourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the existence of such support can be marketed to students and, if the institution itself adheres to the view that language is concrete, it can feel reassured that it is supporting such students. Not only this but, if students do not do well or do not access such support, it can be argued that they are not being responsible or responsibilized (Bonanno, 2017) to take care that they do not fail, or they are not resilient (Hill and Larner, 2017). Thus, we argue that the persuasive power of the arguments neo-liberalism draws on are underpinned by this view of language, and we present this visually in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%