2003
DOI: 10.1086/374335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Resolved Fraction of the Cosmic X‐Ray Background

Abstract: We present the X-ray source number counts in two energy bands (0.5-2 and 2-10 keV) from a very large source sample: we combine data of six different surveys, both shallow wide-field and deep pencil-beam, performed with three different satellites (ROSAT, Chandra, and XMM-Newton). The sample covers with good statistics the largest possible flux range so far: 2:4 Â 10 À17 to 10 À11 ergs s À1 cm À2 in the soft band and 2:1 Â 10 À16 to 8 Â 10 À12 ergs s À1 cm À2 in the hard band. Integrating the flux distributions … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
520
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(572 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
48
520
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Also in this band the bestfit parameters are in excellent agreement with those of the XMM-COSMOS survey with smaller errors on α 2 due to a better sampling of the flux interval below the knee of the relation. A direct comparison with the compilation of Moretti et al (2003) who obtained α 2 = 1.44 ± 0.13 also shows a 1σ consistency. The bright end slope, α 1 = 2.2 ± 0.12 measured in this work is somewhat flatter than the expected Euclidean 2.5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also in this band the bestfit parameters are in excellent agreement with those of the XMM-COSMOS survey with smaller errors on α 2 due to a better sampling of the flux interval below the knee of the relation. A direct comparison with the compilation of Moretti et al (2003) who obtained α 2 = 1.44 ± 0.13 also shows a 1σ consistency. The bright end slope, α 1 = 2.2 ± 0.12 measured in this work is somewhat flatter than the expected Euclidean 2.5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In the other energy bands our fits reproduce well the behaviour of the log N − log S relations also at the bright end side, though the bright end slopes remain slightly flatter that the canonical α 1 = 2.5. The data are compared to those obtained in the XMM-COSMOS survey , the HELLAS2XMM survey (Baldi et al 2002), the compilations of X-ray surveys produced by Moretti et al (2003) and Hasinger et al (2005), the Beppo-Sax survey (Fiore et al 2001;Giommi et al 2000), the Chandra deep surveys CDFN and CDFS (Rosati et al 2002;Bauer et al 2004), the RDSS (Hasinger et al 1993), the extended CDFS (Lehmer et al 2005), the ELAIS-S1 survey (Puccetti et al 2006) and the XMM-HBS survey (Della Ceca et al 2004). The black dashed lines represents the prediction of the X-ray background model of Gilli et al (2007).…”
Section: Number Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalizations of the power-law components of the Chandraspectra were free in the fit, but the powerlaw normalizations of ObsIDs 16235 and 16305 were linked since the observations were taken close in time. The powerlaw normalization of the ROSAT spectrum was fixed tó -8.85 10 7 photons keV −1 cm −2 s −1 arcmin −2 (Moretti et al 2003). The instrumental background-subtracted spectra were modeled with xspec 25 v12.8.2 (Arnaud 1996).…”
Section: Chandra Background Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect that there is a significant contribution from background AGN at these faint luminosities. Moretti et al (2003) consider the AGN contribution in a hard (2-10 keV) and soft (1-2 keV) energy band. We assume a standard AGN spectrum, a power law model with Γ = 1.44 (following Rosati et al 2002), to calculate the AGN flux in our 0.3-10 keV band.…”
Section: Agn Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can then estimate the shape of the CLF intrinsic to the M 31 disc by removing the background AGN contribution according to Moretti et al (2003). In Fig.…”
Section: Agn Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%