2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2008.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The resolvent algebra: A new approach to canonical quantum systems

Abstract: The standard C * -algebraic version of the algebra of canonical commutation relations, the Weyl algebra, frequently causes difficulties in applications since it neither admits the formulation of physically interesting dynamical laws nor does it incorporate pertinent physical observables such as (bounded functions of) the Hamiltonian. Here a novel C * -algebra of the canonical commutation relations is presented which does not suffer from such problems. It is based on the resolvents of the canonical operators an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
149
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1 in [31, p 216]), thus the observable H S does not exist in this representation. Also observe, that this definition of regularity coincides with the one used in [5,8].…”
Section: Kinematics Algebras and Regular Representationssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1 in [31, p 216]), thus the observable H S does not exist in this representation. Also observe, that this definition of regularity coincides with the one used in [5,8].…”
Section: Kinematics Algebras and Regular Representationssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It remains to prove that ω ∞ A Sn = 1 for all n. We will follow the proof of Lemma 7.3 in [5]. Let m > n ∈ N and on H Sm ⊂ H consider the operators H n := H Sn , H m := H Sm and H m\n := H Sm\Sn , and use analogous notation for λ m := λ grnd Sm etc.…”
Section: Using the Identification Above Of Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1].The action of the gauge group on the resolvent algebra R is not pointwise norm continuous, cf. [5, Thm. 5.3(ii)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the basic rules for Fourier transforms, ρ(·) can be shown to be a *-homomorphism on a dense subset, and hence on all of C 0 (R). Furthermore, from [2,Corollary 4.4] it straightforwardly follows that ρ((1/(iλ − ·))ˆ) = (iλ − φ(x)) −1 = R(λ, x). This completes the proof.…”
Section: Weyl Quantizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simple change turns out to give the resolvent algebra a much richer structure, and makes it better suited for modelling dynamics, compared to the Weyl algebra. The resolvent algebra, introduced and thoroughly investigated by Buchholz and Grundling in [2], appears to be useful for many aspects of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, but has left us one important question. This question, posed by Buchholz in a personal communication, concerns the classical limit of the resolvent algebra, or, equivalently (at least within a C*-algebraic framework), its emergence from strict deformation quantization theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%