2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.01.374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The resorptive apparatus of osteoclasts supports lysosomotropism and increases potency of basic versus non-basic inhibitors of cathepsin K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ). The results are consistent with a previous study, in which the IC 50 value of MIV-711 in a bone resorption assay using differentiated human osteoclasts incubated together with bovine bone slices was 37 nmol/L [ 25 ] (note: MIV-711 was referred to as MV076159 in that publication).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 ). The results are consistent with a previous study, in which the IC 50 value of MIV-711 in a bone resorption assay using differentiated human osteoclasts incubated together with bovine bone slices was 37 nmol/L [ 25 ] (note: MIV-711 was referred to as MV076159 in that publication).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…MIV-711 displayed high potency against recombinant human cathepsin K enzyme (K i : 0.98 nmol/L) and inhibited human osteoclast-mediated bone resorption with an IC 50 of 43 nmol/L. The observation that concentrations of MIV-711, which has a pKa value of 7.15, need to be around 50-fold higher than the K i value to show effects on bone resorption in vitro is consistent with previous data [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lysosomal accumulation of drugs may be responsible for cross-inhibition of multiple cathepsins, in various tissues, leading to extraskeletal adverse events [Duong, 2012]. Basic compounds are more potent than nonbasic compounds in suppressing osteoclastic bone resorption [Fuller et al 2010] for a longer duration, without effect on selectivity of the CatK inhibition.…”
Section: What Is a Cathepsin K Inhibitor?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase I and II trials conducted in postmenopausal women showed that ODN to be safe and well tolerated [ 14 ]. Although developed as antiresorptive agents, several compounds show lysosomotropic effects [ 16 ], cutaneous adverse effects and anabolic activity [ 18 ], which are intrinsically related to the selectivity of inhibitors toward CatK. Therefore, alternative compounds having better selectivity toward CatK may complement the use of CKIs in bone resorption therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%