2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja022689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The response of clouds and aerosols to cosmic ray decreases

Abstract: A method is developed to rank Forbush decreases (FDs) in the galactic cosmic ray radiation according to their expected impact on the ionization of the lower atmosphere. Then a Monte Carlo bootstrap‐based statistical test is formulated to estimate the significance of the apparent response in physical and microphysical cloud parameters to FDs. The test is subsequently applied to one ground‐based and three satellite‐based data sets. Responses (>95%) to FDs are found in the following parameters of the analyzed dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The hereto proposed passive nature of planetary albedos does not imply that the global cloud cover could not be influenced by an external forcing such as solar wind, galactic cosmic rays, and/or gravitational fields of other celestial objects. Empirical evidence strongly suggests that it can [108][109][110][111][112][113], but the magnitude of such influences is expected to be small compared to the total albedo due to the presence of stabilizing negative feedbacks within the system. We also anticipate that the sensitivity of GMATs to an albedo change will greatly vary among planetary bodies.…”
Section: Role Of Planetary Albedosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hereto proposed passive nature of planetary albedos does not imply that the global cloud cover could not be influenced by an external forcing such as solar wind, galactic cosmic rays, and/or gravitational fields of other celestial objects. Empirical evidence strongly suggests that it can [108][109][110][111][112][113], but the magnitude of such influences is expected to be small compared to the total albedo due to the presence of stabilizing negative feedbacks within the system. We also anticipate that the sensitivity of GMATs to an albedo change will greatly vary among planetary bodies.…”
Section: Role Of Planetary Albedosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism is under debate, but several possible pathways have been suggested, including total solar irradiance (TSI; Foukal, 2004Foukal, , 2006, ultraviolet (UV; Hood, 1986;Shindell, 1999;Kodera and Kuroda, 2002), and galactic cosmic rays (GCRs; Svensmark and Friis-Christensen, 1997;Marsh and Svensmark, 2000;Svensmark et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms for a solar influence on the climate and weather are not certain; however, possible explanations are given based on the forcing of solar radiation (Foukal, 2004(Foukal, , 2006Hood, 1986;Shindell, 1999;Kodera and Kuroda, 2002;Zhou and Tung, 2013), galactic cosmic rays (Svensmark and Friis-Christensen, 1997;Marsh and Svensmark, 2000;Yamaguchi et al, 2010;Svensmark et al, 2016), solar energetic particles (Jackman et al, 2009;Scott et al, 2014), and from the changes in the atmospheric electric circuit (Tinsley, 1996;Owens et al, 2015). The variations of solar-related parameters associated with solar rotations are quasi-periodic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%