2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The response of Populus spp. to cadmium stress: Chemical, morphological and proteomics study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They all noted that the obvious restriction of growth occurred in the fresh and dry weight of roots and aerial parts of stressed plants. Marmiroli et al (2013) that the most common response of the poplar clones to the presence of Cd was a marked reduction in main root elongation. Under these conditions, roots were the first organ in contact with the metal element appeared to be heavily affected by their toxicity (Shah et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They all noted that the obvious restriction of growth occurred in the fresh and dry weight of roots and aerial parts of stressed plants. Marmiroli et al (2013) that the most common response of the poplar clones to the presence of Cd was a marked reduction in main root elongation. Under these conditions, roots were the first organ in contact with the metal element appeared to be heavily affected by their toxicity (Shah et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Different pieces of evidence in various plant species indicated that heavy metal stress can down-regulate proteins involved in carbon metabolism (Kieffer et al, 2008). In poplar (Populus tremula L.), 14-days Cd administration induced a general reduction of carbon metabolism enzymes abundance, including RuBisCO and RuBisCO activase (Kieffer et al, 2008;Marmiroli et al, 2013). However, it has been reported that in the heavy metal-stress tolerant species Typha angustifolia, 30-days Cd administration induced an increase of RuBisCO large (or small) subunit, of RuBisCO activase (Bah et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants were then harvested and separated into roots, stems and leaves (initial cuttings were not included in any analyses). Roots were washed thoroughly with tap water and immersed in a 0.05 mM CaCl2 solution for 30 minutes to remove any surface adhering metals (Marmiroli et al, 2013), roots were rinsed with deionized water and scanned using the software WinRhizo®, to determine the root length, diameter, root tips, surface area and volume. All plant parts were dried separately in an oven at 70 o C for seven days, then dry weight (DW) was determined.…”
Section: Harvest and Phytotoxicity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%