2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2011.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The response of salt intrusion to changes in river discharge and tidal mixing during the dry season in the Modaomen Estuary, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
131
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5. The length of the 30 intrusion decreases during spring tides and increases during neap tides, which is consistent with what generally happens in a partially mixed estuary (Bowen and Geyer, 2003;Gong et al, 2011). It is noteworthy that from Day 25 to 28 and from Day 54 to 57 of the neap tides, the length of the salt intrusion increases substantially, but there is no meaningful increase in the length of the intrusion during the neap tide from Day 39 to 42.…”
Section: 1salt Intrusion Without Windsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5. The length of the 30 intrusion decreases during spring tides and increases during neap tides, which is consistent with what generally happens in a partially mixed estuary (Bowen and Geyer, 2003;Gong et al, 2011). It is noteworthy that from Day 25 to 28 and from Day 54 to 57 of the neap tides, the length of the salt intrusion increases substantially, but there is no meaningful increase in the length of the intrusion during the neap tide from Day 39 to 42.…”
Section: 1salt Intrusion Without Windsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Gong and Shen, 2011;. As salt intrusion is most serious during the dry season when strong winds and waves occur, there is a need for an improved understanding of the effects of winds and waves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Hansen and Rattray (1965) steady-state estuarine model, the salt intrusion distance is proportional to river flow with an exponent of about À0.33 (Monismith et al, 2002). The exponent varies for different estuaries depending on the localized bathymetry and hydrology (Gong and Gibson and Najjar, 2000). The exponent for the James River ranges from À0.149 to À0.238, which is lower than the theoretical value of À0.33, suggesting that salinity can migrate farther upstream for a given discharge of the James River.…”
Section: Relation Of Discharge and Salinity Intrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has been successfully applied to a wide range of environmental studies (e.g. Gong and Shen, 2011;Hong and Shen, 2012;Shen and Haas, 2004).…”
Section: Numerical Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%