2018
DOI: 10.18651/er/4q18cakirmelek
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Response of U.S. Investment to Oil Price Shocks: Does the Shale Boom Matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the US oil production, as well as investment related to innovations in shale oil recovery techniques, has dramatically expanded since 2005. Moreover, the split between the two subperiods broadly coincides with previous papers including Kang et al (2016) and Cakir Melek (2018).…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the US oil production, as well as investment related to innovations in shale oil recovery techniques, has dramatically expanded since 2005. Moreover, the split between the two subperiods broadly coincides with previous papers including Kang et al (2016) and Cakir Melek (2018).…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, Baumeister and Kilian (2016) document the muted response of aggregate economic activity to the unprecedented decline in oil prices from 2014 to 2016 1 . Cakir Melek (2018) also finds that aggregate investment in the United States has become more positively responsive to oil price shocks since the shale oil boom. Moreover, Bjørnland and Zhulanova (2019) show the evident emergence of the positive spillover to non‐oil investment, employment, and production from an increase in oil prices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loria (2017) finds that, while a small oil price increase leads to a decline in U.S. nonresidential fixed investment, the effect of a large oil price increase is ambiguous. However, Çakır Melek et al (2017), Çakır Melek (2018, and Bjørnland and Zhulanova (2019) show that the response of U.S. investment to oil price shocks has changed following the shale boom in mid-2016. Specifically, they find that U.S. investment has become more responsive to demand shocks and less responsive to oil supply shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%