1975
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The responses of muscle spindles in sheep extraocular muscles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight units from muscle spindles (2 from LR, 2 SO, 1 SR, 1 MR, 1 IR, 1 IO) were identified by their low threshold to muscle stretch and by their response to tetanic stimulation of the motor nerve [4]. The discharge frequency of the proprioceptive units and tension of the muscle to which the unit belonged were measured at different static muscle lengths from Lr -2 to Lr + 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight units from muscle spindles (2 from LR, 2 SO, 1 SR, 1 MR, 1 IR, 1 IO) were identified by their low threshold to muscle stretch and by their response to tetanic stimulation of the motor nerve [4]. The discharge frequency of the proprioceptive units and tension of the muscle to which the unit belonged were measured at different static muscle lengths from Lr -2 to Lr + 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of such effects of SCh on the intrafusal fibers in muscle spindles, many investigators have attempted to clarify the functional and morphological significance of muscle spindles, including their afferent contacts on intrafusal fibers, the classification of their afferents, and their central projections (e.g., Cody et al, 1972;Browne, 1975;Dutia, 1980;Inoue et al, 1981;Price and Dutia, 1987;Scott, 1988Scott, , 1990Scott, , 1991Taylor et al, 1992aTaylor et al, ,b, 1993Carr et al, 1996). Although it has been generally agreed that muscle spindle afferents from the limb or neck muscles are mainly classified into primary and secondary endings on the basis of their conduction velocities, fiber diameters, and dynamic and static sensitivities or other functional properties to stretch responses, the position of the dividing line between the two populations is somewhat variable among different muscles (e.g., Hunt, 1951;Matthews, 1963Matthews, , 1972Crowe and Matthews, 1964;Koeze, 1968Koeze, , 1973Lennerstrand, 1968;Matthews and Stein, 1969;Browne, 1975;Cheney and Preston, 1976;Richmond and Abrahams, 1979;Wei et al, 1986;Price and Dutia, 1987;Scott, 1990;Carr et al, 1996). However, jaw muscle and extraocular muscle spindle afferents may not be classified into primary and secondary endings on the basis of their fiber diameters, conduction velocities, as well as from dynamic sensitivities or other parameters to stretch responses, because of the lack of any clear evidence of a bimodal distribution of the values of DI (Browne, 1975;Inoue et al, 1981;Shigenaga et al, 1990;Taylor et al, 1992a).…”
Section: Classification Of Spindle Afferentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afferent discharges in nerves of EOMs present the classical features of the muscle spindles responses, whether or not animals are provided with muscle spindles (Bach-y-Rita and Murata, 1964;Bach-y-Rita and Ito, 1966b;Browne, 1975). However, until now, the trigger features and discharges of the different muscle receptors have never been analysed.…”
Section: Functional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%