1989
DOI: 10.1068/a210905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Restructuring Thesis and the Study of Public Services

Abstract: Abstract. The relevance of the restructuring thesis for the analysis of recent changes in the structure of public services is considered. It is argued that recent changes in public services are far more complex than suggested by the notion of privatisation and that a variety of concepts previously applied to the study of manufacturing industries can also be applied to the study of public services. The concepts considered include intensification, rationalisation, technical change, and self-provisioning. The pap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reconstruction of the countryside arena within what is termed 'accessible countryside' or exurbia gives rise to new tensions and conflicts associated with the intersection of both production and consumption functions within the same geographical space (Cadieux 2005). Here, external pressures from diverse points of origin such as Common Agriculture Policy reform (Rickard 2004), centralisation of public services (Pinch 1989), variations in local housing markets (Gallent et al 2003), commuting, population change (Findlay et al 2001;Stockdale 2005) and leisure demands (Scott 1998), combine to make simple urban-rural conceptualisations redundant in favour of an approach that recognises the differing nature and extent of urbanrural interrelationships (Browder 2002;Hodge and Monk 2004;Scott et al 2008). However, whilst such views command significant support, Evans et al (2002) provide a powerful paper challenging evidence that such concepts have permeated the culture and behaviours of key rural stakeholders.…”
Section: Countryside(s) Of Production and Consumption?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This reconstruction of the countryside arena within what is termed 'accessible countryside' or exurbia gives rise to new tensions and conflicts associated with the intersection of both production and consumption functions within the same geographical space (Cadieux 2005). Here, external pressures from diverse points of origin such as Common Agriculture Policy reform (Rickard 2004), centralisation of public services (Pinch 1989), variations in local housing markets (Gallent et al 2003), commuting, population change (Findlay et al 2001;Stockdale 2005) and leisure demands (Scott 1998), combine to make simple urban-rural conceptualisations redundant in favour of an approach that recognises the differing nature and extent of urbanrural interrelationships (Browder 2002;Hodge and Monk 2004;Scott et al 2008). However, whilst such views command significant support, Evans et al (2002) provide a powerful paper challenging evidence that such concepts have permeated the culture and behaviours of key rural stakeholders.…”
Section: Countryside(s) Of Production and Consumption?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most economic geographers would probably agree with Pahl (1988, 4) when he notes that "we are living through a period of change that is qualitatively and quantitatively different from that typical of most of the twentieth century". Economic geography during the 1980s was concerned with the exploration of elements of this restructuring (Massey, 1984;Pinch, 1989), identifying the new international division of labour and technological change as two of the most important determinants of economic change. Much of the work on restructuring concentrated on manufacturing, ignoring the process within the service sector (Sayer, 1985) and the growth and development of small business service firms (Batstone, 1989;Keeble et al, 1991;Keeble and Bryson, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Add to this the trend toward increasing policy heterogeneity, which has resulted from the uneven impact of restrictions on local autonomy and local council attempts to ensure that their policy preferences are implemented . In so far as there is scope to promote locally favoured initiatives within the confines of central direction, this has resulted in greater diversity in the style and tactics of public policy implementation (Pinch, 1989). Not surprisingly, the scene is set for greater disparities in local performance (with some major policy differences expressed without expenditure effects) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%