2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The retention effects of high years of service cliff-vesting pension plans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Responses suggest that there will be a small increase in retention rates of enlisted personnel in the early-career years; for officers, retention will be similar up to 12 YOS, at which point there will be a considerable decrease in retention rates under the MRS. These findings are in contrast to the simulations [1], who conclude that retention rates would not appreciably change under the MRS; furthermore, despite the fact that our data reflect stated preferences and not actual choices, these findings echo the actual retention behavior of Australian military members who made a similar choice between a defined benefit and defined contribution retirement scheme in the 1990s [2]. This paper also contributes to the broader empirical literature on choices in military retirement systems [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Responses suggest that there will be a small increase in retention rates of enlisted personnel in the early-career years; for officers, retention will be similar up to 12 YOS, at which point there will be a considerable decrease in retention rates under the MRS. These findings are in contrast to the simulations [1], who conclude that retention rates would not appreciably change under the MRS; furthermore, despite the fact that our data reflect stated preferences and not actual choices, these findings echo the actual retention behavior of Australian military members who made a similar choice between a defined benefit and defined contribution retirement scheme in the 1990s [2]. This paper also contributes to the broader empirical literature on choices in military retirement systems [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%