2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The return of subscapularis strength after shoulder arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a prospective double-blind randomized-controlled trial comparing SST and LTO, no significant differences were observed at 2 years postoperatively between groups for functional outcome scores, healing rates, or subscapularis fatty degeneration. 17,32,33 In conclusion, all 3 approaches to subscapularis management appear to yield similar clinical results. Factors that should be taken into account in choosing an approach include surgeon skill, whether medialization of the tendon may be required, the degree of robustness of the subscapularis tendon, and the ability to follow the status of subscapularis healing postoperatively.…”
Section: Difficulty Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In a prospective double-blind randomized-controlled trial comparing SST and LTO, no significant differences were observed at 2 years postoperatively between groups for functional outcome scores, healing rates, or subscapularis fatty degeneration. 17,32,33 In conclusion, all 3 approaches to subscapularis management appear to yield similar clinical results. Factors that should be taken into account in choosing an approach include surgeon skill, whether medialization of the tendon may be required, the degree of robustness of the subscapularis tendon, and the ability to follow the status of subscapularis healing postoperatively.…”
Section: Difficulty Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The incidence of total shoulder arthroplasty has been rising in the last decade 1 and there has been a trend towards smaller implants and more minimally invasive approaches 2 . As demonstrated by the joint registries 3 the most common approaches in current practice are the deltopectoral and antero-superior approaches, both of which violate the subscapularis tendon and can lead to long term dysfunction [4][5][6][7] . As a result, there has been a move towards rotator cuff sparing approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have demonstrated subscapularis dysfunction following a deltopectoral approach to the shoulder involving subscapularis takedown and repair. 2 , 5 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 Subscapularis dysfunction has been defined as decreased active internal rotation strength, positive subscapularis examination maneuvers (ie, lift-off, belly-press, and bear hug), and the inability to tuck in the shirt behind the back. This has been described in postoperative patients after anatomic TSA, 2 , 5 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 Latarjet procedures, open Bankart repair, 27 and open instability procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%