2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2012.01757.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The return to hospitality

Abstract: Anthropology has been largely absent from the recent explosion of interdisciplinary enthusiasm with hospitality across philosophy, political science, and cultural studies. Yet anthropology's living engagement with hospitality has been far deeper than that of any other discipline. This essay, which introduces the volume, aims to revitalize hospitality as a frontier area of theoretical development in anthropology by highlighting the topic's connections to some of our discipline's most vibrant themes and concerns… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
96
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Hocart (1952) and Sahlins (1985Sahlins ( , 2008 have brilliantly reasoned how the capacity to generate fortune and prosperity is one of the marks of sovereign power. Fortune and kingship come from the outside, the sovereign source of vitality being perceived as a sacred stranger, a god in disguise, or as a guest or beggar (see also Candea and da Col 2012). Among the many Dechen oral narratives, the most popular one is a moral exemplar about hospitality, fortune, and a lama stranger.…”
Section: Three-legged Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7 Hocart (1952) and Sahlins (1985Sahlins ( , 2008 have brilliantly reasoned how the capacity to generate fortune and prosperity is one of the marks of sovereign power. Fortune and kingship come from the outside, the sovereign source of vitality being perceived as a sacred stranger, a god in disguise, or as a guest or beggar (see also Candea and da Col 2012). Among the many Dechen oral narratives, the most popular one is a moral exemplar about hospitality, fortune, and a lama stranger.…”
Section: Three-legged Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As in the case of the Melanesian Big Man (Strathern 1991) or the Amazonian owner-master (Fausto 2008), rather than having 'representatives', God was constituted as a plural singularity, a dynamic image in permanent figure-ground reversal comprising majestas and praxis-sovereign unity and economic-pragmatic plurality-within itself. But, as often happens in the encounter with concepts developed by continental theorists, such as Derrida's 'hostipitality' (Candea and da Col 2012) or the recent fads musing on Freud's 'uncanny', anthropology should be wary of relinquishing its own distinctive tradition. A close examination of Agamben's works reveals his Parisian inspirations and a keen interest in French ethnology and ethno-history.…”
Section: Theologies Of Fortunementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the gift or hospitality (Candea and da Col 2012), luck and fortune appear to be tropes liable to affect all spheres of human sociality. In moral reflections, luck and fortune problematize notions of agency and responsibility; in political cosmologies, they intervene in the (dis)connections between will, action, and efficacy and confine the magnitude of human authority; in economic exchange, they single out the tensions between personal skills, choice, and notions of value, as in gift giving, where fortune and luck embed spiritual properties within material entities.…”
Section: The Omnipotence Of Luck and Chancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As he points out, 'stagecraft is essential to the management of this situation' (ibid. ), thus referring to the where and the when of the encounters between strangers (see also Candea and Da Col 2012 Focusing on the practices of dining and hospitality as a form of re-scaling diplomatic encounters beyond the state-level, this paper is situated in a dervish lodge in a post-cosmopolitan town in post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina. It explores how the notion of sofra, which the dervishes associate with an elaborate etiquette of hospitality, dining and food sharing, is deployed as an idiom embodying both a site of everyday diplomacy in its spatio-material configurations, as well as a mode of 'being diplomatic'.…”
Section: Re-scaling Diplomatic Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%