2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1008452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Returns to Continuous Training in Germany: New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching Estimators

Abstract: Abstract:The present paper examines the wage effects of continuous training programs using individual-level data from the German Socio Economic Panel (GSOEP). In order to account for selectivity in training participation we estimate average treatment effects (ATE and ATT) of general and firm-specific continuous training programs using several state-of-the-art propensity score matching (PSM) estimators. Additionally, we also apply a combined matching difference-in-differences (MDiD) estimator to account for uno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the OLS model in Columns D and E of Table 3, participation in training was related to an increase of 12 percentage points in log hourly wages, which dropped to four percentage points when job characteristics were included. This is in line with previous cross-sectional analyses of training effects on wages (e.g., [28]). The specification in Columns F additionally included a lag in log hourly wages to take account of state dependence in wages.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the OLS model in Columns D and E of Table 3, participation in training was related to an increase of 12 percentage points in log hourly wages, which dropped to four percentage points when job characteristics were included. This is in line with previous cross-sectional analyses of training effects on wages (e.g., [28]). The specification in Columns F additionally included a lag in log hourly wages to take account of state dependence in wages.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, our findings are consistent with the majority of studies conducted in Germany, which have revealed that the wage returns to training are small or non-existent [22, 24–26, 29]. Larger wage returns to training have been found only in a few studies, yet these diverging results may be explained by the fact that these studies focused on specific age groups (i.e., 20-44years; [27]) or a specific form of training (i.e., general training; [28]). The close correspondence between our findings and previous ones also enhances confidence in our findings concerning literacy; if results regarding wages are similar to previous findings, it seems highly unlikely that our findings regarding literacy skills are driven by idiosyncrasies of the current sample, training measure, or analytical approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results for Germany (cf. no return in Pischke 2001, with 5 % return in Mühler et al 2007) and France (cf. no return in Goux and Maurin 2000, with positive return for job switchers in Fougère et al 2001) are less clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%