2008
DOI: 10.1163/156920608x296079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 'Returns to Religion': Messianism, Christianity and the Revolutionary Tradition. Part I: 'Wakefulness to the Future'

Abstract: Th e central strength of the Hegelian dialectical tradition is that reason is not divorced from its own internal limits in the name of a reason free from ideological mediation and constraint. Th is article holds onto this insight in the examination of the recent (and widespread) returns to religious categories in political philosophy and political theory (in particular Agamben, Badiou, Negri and Žižek). In this respect the article follows a two-fold logic. In the spirit of Hegel and Marx, it seeks to recover w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem with this type of spiritually-based progressivism is that it shifts its metaphysical stance from transcendental contemplation to immanent activism after having cleared ground for an enlightened gnostic cognition (Roberts 2008). The strict other-worldly metaphysical commitment shared by Plato (1993) and Voegelin (1952) is compromised in the spirituality discourse in the form of an ambivalent logic that accommodates both transcendence and radical immanence.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with this type of spiritually-based progressivism is that it shifts its metaphysical stance from transcendental contemplation to immanent activism after having cleared ground for an enlightened gnostic cognition (Roberts 2008). The strict other-worldly metaphysical commitment shared by Plato (1993) and Voegelin (1952) is compromised in the spirituality discourse in the form of an ambivalent logic that accommodates both transcendence and radical immanence.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More significantly for my argument, leading figures in the early German communist movement were also deeply influenced, including Wilhelm Weitling, Hermann Kriege, Karl Grün, and Gottfried Kinkel. Marx and Engels worked until they dropped to excise this rather Christian element from within communism (Marx and Engels [1846b] Yet, despite all the hard work of Marx and Engels, this stream of Christian communism -with its long, long history that precedes Marx and Engels (see Kautsky [1895Kautsky [ -97] 1947a[1895 -97] 1947b; Kautsky andLafargue [1922] 1977;Roberts 2008aRoberts , 2008b)-would not exit the scene, tail between its legs. Instead, I suggest, it shows up in Luxemburg's argument in Socialism and the Churches, profoundly modified and reshaped in light of Engels's reconstruction of the revolutionary origins of Christianity.…”
Section: Birth Of a Mythmentioning
confidence: 99%