2020
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0106-20.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reuniens and Rhomboid Nuclei Are Required for Acquisition of Pavlovian Trace Fear Conditioning in Rats

Abstract: The reuniens (Re) and rhomboid (Rh) nuclei (ReRh) of the midline thalamus interconnects the hippocampus (HPC) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Several studies have suggested that the ReRh participates in various cognitive tasks. However, little is known about the contribution of the ReRh in Pavlovian trace fear conditioning, a procedure with a temporal gap between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US), and therefore making it harder for the animals to acquire. Because the HP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the RE appears necessary for contextual memory, as illustrated in studies using contextual fear conditioning. For example, muscimol inactivation before acquisition or retrieval impaired contextual fear conditioning ( Ramanathan et al, 2018 ), and the acquisition, but not retrieval, of trace fear conditioning ( Lin, Chiou, & Chang, 2020 ) in male rats. Further, chemogenetic inactivation using hM4Di also impaired contextual fear conditioning in male mice ( Vetere et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the RE appears necessary for contextual memory, as illustrated in studies using contextual fear conditioning. For example, muscimol inactivation before acquisition or retrieval impaired contextual fear conditioning ( Ramanathan et al, 2018 ), and the acquisition, but not retrieval, of trace fear conditioning ( Lin, Chiou, & Chang, 2020 ) in male rats. Further, chemogenetic inactivation using hM4Di also impaired contextual fear conditioning in male mice ( Vetere et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the role of RE in cognitive functions is generally well established, relatively little is known regarding its involvement in affective behavior-possibly linked to HF-mPFC communication. The majority of studies on this topic have focused on the role of RE in learned fear (Lin, Chiou, & Chang, 2020;Moscarello, 2020;Quet et al, 2020;Ramanathan, Jin, Giustino, Payne, & Maren, 2018a;Ramanathan & Maren, 2019;Ramanathan, Ressler, Jin, & Maren, 2018b;Sierra et al, 2017;Troyner, Bicca, & Bertoglio, 2018;Xu & SĂŒdhof, 2013). For instance, in an initial report, Xu and SĂŒdhof (2013) demonstrated that inactivation of mPFC terminals to RE produced an overgeneralization of contextual fear memory, and that suppressing or enhancing RE terminals to the HF resulted in an overgeneralization or a reduction of contextual fear memory, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, previous research shows that exposure to acute stress (swim and restraint stress) produces high levels of c-fos mRNA expression in the RE (Cullinan, Herman, Battaglia, Akil, & Watson, 1995;Kafetzopoulos et al, 2018), suggesting possible recruitment of the region during a stressor. It is known that the RE is recruited during encoding of contextual information during fear conditioning (Lin, Chiou, & Chang, 2020), suggesting this region is involved in the formation and acquisition of stressor or context-related memory (Eichenbaum, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During encoding of contextual information during fear conditioning (Lin et al, 2020), the RE coordinates mPFC-hippocampal interactions (Eichenbaum, 2017). Further, connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and RE may be distinctly involved in regulating immobility behavior during stressor exposure and re-exposure to the stressor-paired context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%