2015
DOI: 10.4172/2252-5211.1000177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reuse of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract: The management of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) has much scope for improvement in almost all countries. Some legislation, such as the European Directive, aims to increase reuse, to prevent such equipment from being recycled without being reused. In this sense, the reuse of WEEE has a huge interest from an economic, environmental, legal, and social viewpoint. However, this has not been studied much so far. This paper adopts a bibliometric analysis of the scholarly literature that has addresse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These targets support the implementation of the European waste hierarchy (prevention, PfR, recycling, other recovery, and disposal-in that order of priority) in general but do not provide incentives for an increase of PfR in comparison to recycling. This lack of binding requirements for PfR is criticized by different stakeholders (Johnson, McMahon, & Fitzpatrick, 2015;Queiruga & Queiruga-Dios, 2015;RREUSE, 2011). Several organizations such as Comput-erAid, RREUSE, ACR+, and the European Environmental Bureau support a PfR target of 5% as suggested by the European Parliament (Esenduran, Kemahlioglu-Ziya, & Swaminathan, 2016).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These targets support the implementation of the European waste hierarchy (prevention, PfR, recycling, other recovery, and disposal-in that order of priority) in general but do not provide incentives for an increase of PfR in comparison to recycling. This lack of binding requirements for PfR is criticized by different stakeholders (Johnson, McMahon, & Fitzpatrick, 2015;Queiruga & Queiruga-Dios, 2015;RREUSE, 2011). Several organizations such as Comput-erAid, RREUSE, ACR+, and the European Environmental Bureau support a PfR target of 5% as suggested by the European Parliament (Esenduran, Kemahlioglu-Ziya, & Swaminathan, 2016).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charitable institutions conduct the major part of processing municipally collected waste for the preparation for reuse (Sander et al, 2013;Schomerus et al, 2014), but the overall amount of goods undergoing recovery operations for remarketing is minimal. Johnson et al (2015) and Queiruga and Queiruga-Dios (2015) identify a strong need for a distinct quota for reuse, since legislation promotes the preparation for reuse as the preferred waste management option compared to recycling, which is contrary to current practice. Existing research (Guerra González, 2013;Sander et al, 2013;Schomerus et al, 2014) analyzes organizational structures, the legal framework, and generic recommendations for enforcing the second priority of the waste hierarchy on a qualitative basis, targeting almost exclusively WEEE.…”
Section: Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research (Guerra González, 2013;Sander et al, 2013;Schomerus et al, 2014) analyzes organizational structures, the legal framework, and generic recommendations for enforcing the second priority of the waste hierarchy on a qualitative basis, targeting almost exclusively WEEE. Pérez-Belis et al (2015) conducted an in-depth literature review focusing on inter alia management, generation, characterization, and reuse of WEEE, but state that "further case studies are needed in countries that practice greater reuse" (Queiruga and Queiruga-Dios, 2015). CIWM (2016) describe the status quo of reuse in the UK and derive recommendations for industry and government.…”
Section: Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEE industry is responsible for 10%-20% of the worldwide environmental impact related to the depletion of nonrenewable resources (Cruz-Sotelo et al, 2017). As a consequence, electronic wastes have become a new policy priority around the globe and decision-makers have the challenge of handling the waste of electrical and electronic devices to minimize health impact in an economical and environmentally friendly manner (Araceli & Dios, 2015). In the past, most e-waste regulations are prompted by and focused on environmental protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%