2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The revolving door: Hospital readmissions of gynecologic oncology patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been increasing global scrutiny on health care spending with a push to identify strategies to safely reduce unnecessary use of health care resources, including targeting the costly area of preventable readmissions [5]. Rates of unscheduled readmissions are becoming accessible to both health care consumers and organisations, with high rates viewed as an indicator of poor quality care [6]. Strategies that aid identification of those most at risk of costly, preventable readmission are under review by health care organisations globally [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been increasing global scrutiny on health care spending with a push to identify strategies to safely reduce unnecessary use of health care resources, including targeting the costly area of preventable readmissions [5]. Rates of unscheduled readmissions are becoming accessible to both health care consumers and organisations, with high rates viewed as an indicator of poor quality care [6]. Strategies that aid identification of those most at risk of costly, preventable readmission are under review by health care organisations globally [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates of unscheduled readmissions are becoming accessible to both health care consumers and organisations, with high rates viewed as an indicator of poor quality care [6]. Strategies that aid identification of those most at risk of costly, preventable readmission are under review by health care organisations globally [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Fauci et al, 16 it was identified that the most common reasons for rehospitalization were small bowel obstruction/ileus (55.9%), wound complications (11.7%), thromboembolic events (11.7%), and bowel perforation (8.8%). In the study conducted by Henretta et al, 15 it was concluded that the causes of rehospitalization was, respectively, as gastrointestinal (40.7%), chemotherapy (12.6%), infection (15.5%), pain (8.7%), and pulmonary (5.8%). In a case study conducted by Alhilli et al, 17 the most common indicators for rehospitalization were surgical site infection (21.2%), pleural effusion/ascites management (14.4%), and thromboembolic events (12.5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…9,12Y14 In this study, the rate of rehospitalization was identified to be 48.0% within 90 days of discharge. In a study conducted on patients with gynecological cancer by Henretta et al, 15 the population of the study was 324 women with gynecological cancer, and the rate of rehospitalization was 13.2%; in the study of Fauci et al, 16 the population for the study was 207 women with ovarian cancer who underwent surgery, and the rate of rehospitalization was 16.0%. In the study conducted by Alhilli et al, 17 where the patient population was 324 women who have epithelial ovarian cancer, the rate of rehospitalization was 19.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation