2015
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1054298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rhetoric of the President of the European Commission: charismatic leader or neutral mediator?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Recently this theoretical framework has also been applied to the case of the euro crisis in order to appraise the charismatic rhetoric and leadership of the President of the European Commission (Olsson & Hammargård ). In the remainder of the article we will further extend this language‐based approach to measure the presence of charisma in the crisis leadership of the ECB.…”
Section: Charisma and The Ecbmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…). Recently this theoretical framework has also been applied to the case of the euro crisis in order to appraise the charismatic rhetoric and leadership of the President of the European Commission (Olsson & Hammargård ). In the remainder of the article we will further extend this language‐based approach to measure the presence of charisma in the crisis leadership of the ECB.…”
Section: Charisma and The Ecbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Bligh & Robinson ; Davis & Gardner ; Bastardoz et al. ; Olsson & Hammargård ), we have analysed the corpus of ECB speeches by combining DICTION variables into seven composite constructs, building on the linguistic characteristics of charisma listed in the previous section. Table summarises the seven constructs and the corresponding formulas of DICTION variables, along with sample words for each variable and text examples extracted from various ECB presidential speeches…”
Section: Research Design and Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This article focuses on one such international organisation—the European Union—to assess this very question. While the EU has received some scholarly crisis management attention (e.g., Attinà, Boin, & Ekengren, ; Boin, Ekengren, et al., ; Hollis, ; Morsut, ; Olsson & Hammargård, ), two developments of late require a reassessment of our understanding of supranational crisis management. First, how scholars assess the politico‐administrative requirements of modern transboundary crisis management has changed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%