2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2016.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ribosomal RNA operon ( rrn ) of Campylobacter concisus supports molecular typing to genomospecies level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phylogenetic trees generated from 15 rrn operons and 23S rRNA genes also demonstrated sequence differences between strains within the rrn. Hence, the study confirmed that C. concisus can be classified into two genomospecies (A& B) based on the presence of the indels in the rrn operon and the 23S rRNA gene is a more reliable target for C. concisus typing than the 16S rRNA gene [80].…”
Section: Typing By Rrn Analysissupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The phylogenetic trees generated from 15 rrn operons and 23S rRNA genes also demonstrated sequence differences between strains within the rrn. Hence, the study confirmed that C. concisus can be classified into two genomospecies (A& B) based on the presence of the indels in the rrn operon and the 23S rRNA gene is a more reliable target for C. concisus typing than the 16S rRNA gene [80].…”
Section: Typing By Rrn Analysissupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The diversity of the ribosomal RNA (rrn) operon (5S rRNA, 16S rRNA, 23S rRNA genes, and the ITS regions) is considered a useful tool for differentiation of the heterogeneous C. concisus species [80]. The sequences of C. concisus rrn operons were used in a recent study for the purpose of strain typing and delineation of phylogenetic relationships within these operons.…”
Section: Typing By Rrn Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine whether the C. concisus plasmids found in this study are associated with different types of gastrointestinal disease, their prevalence in a total of 239 strains in the public databases was compared using NCBI nucleotide blast [35]. These strains included 58 strains from 29 patients with CD, 62 strains from 28 patients with UC, 64 strains from 42 healthy individuals, 54 strains from 46 patients with diarrhoea and 1 strain from a patient with IBD (unknown if CD or UC) [13,14,19,22,[38][39][40]. Of the C. concisus strains isolated from patients with UC, 40 strains were from 15 patients who have undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (UC-IPAA) due to their severe disease, and they were referred to as severe UC [41].…”
Section: Examination Of the Association Between The Newly Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. concisus strains can be separated into two major genomospecies (GS), consistently defined by the analysis of core genomes and housekeeping genes (Istivan, 2005 ; Miller et al, 2012 ; Mahendran et al, 2015 ; Chung et al, 2016 ; Nielsen et al, 2016 ). C. concisus 23S rRNA gene has polymorphisms, which was also used to define the genomospecies by comparison of the entire 23S rRNA gene sequence or PCR amplification of 23S rRNA gene fragments (Engberg et al, 2005 ; Kalischuk and Inglis, 2011 ; On et al, 2013 ; Huq et al, 2017 ; Wang et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Concisusmentioning
confidence: 99%