The rich get richer and the poor get poorer: Country- and state-level income inequality moderates the job insecurity-burnout relationship.

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of income inequality in today's society, research on the implications of income inequality for organizational research is scant. This study takes the first step to explore the contextual role of national- and state- level income inequality as a moderator in the relationship between individual-level job insecurity (JI) and burnout. Drawing from conservation of resource (COR) theory, we argue that income inequality at the country-level and state-level threatens one's obtainment of object (i.e., material coping) and condition (i.e., nonmaterial coping) resources, thus serving as an environmental stressor exacerbating one's burnout reactions to JI. The predicted cross-level interaction effect of income inequality was tested in 2 studies. Study 1 consisting of 23,778 individuals nested in 30 countries explored the moderating effect of country-level income inequality on the relationship between individual JI and exhaustion. Study 2 collected data from 402 employees residing in 48 states in the United States, and tested the moderating effect of state-level income inequality on the relationship between JI and burnout (i.e., emotional exhaustion and cynicism). Results of both studies converge to support the exacerbating role of higher-level income inequality on the JI -burnout relationship. Our findings contribute to the literature on psychological health disparities by exploring the contextual role of income inequality as a predictor of differential reactions to JI. (PsycINFO Database Record

Cognitive and Affective Job Insecurity: A Meta-Analysis and a Primary Study

“…Organizations could also provide employees with participative decision-making opportunities (Probst, 2005) by allowing employees to have a substantial voice in job-related decisions and enhance organizational communication (Jiang & Probst, 2014) by implementing a “realistic merger preview” (Schweiger & DeNisi, 1991) and opening the lines of communication with employees. While country-level and state-level income inequality may exacerbate one’s reaction to JI (Jiang & Probst, 2017), greater employment protection and income security (Carr & Chung, 2014; Debus, Probst, König, & Kleinmann, 2012) may help alleviate effects of JI. Thus, offering societal-level support structures (e.g., longer unemployment assistance, job skills retraining programs) may mitigate some adverse consequences of JI.…”

Job Insecurity and Mental Health: The Moderating Role of Coping Strategies From a Gender Perspective

“…There is a wide array of research studies related to the multilevel or psychosocial dimensions of job insecurity. This phenomenon is influenced by socioeconomic factors, both in terms of their occurrence and their consequences (Keim et al, 2014; Jiang and Probst, 2017; Shoss, 2017; Lee et al, 2018). Even the implementation of strategies such as the intention to change jobs, studied in the context of job insecurity (Stiglbauer et al, 2012), depends on the employability perceived by the individual (Balz and Schuller, 2018).…”

How authentic leadership impacts on job insecurity: The multiple mediating role of psychological empowerment and psychological capital

“…Job insecurity refers to the employees' perception and interpretation of their work environment, specifically their expectation of whether there are risks to the continuity of their work, and anxiety over the stability of their jobs (Sverke, Hellgren, & Näswall, 2002). Job insecurity influences individuals' attitudes and the physical conditions of employees (Aronsson et al, 2017; Barrech, Baumert, Emeny, Gündel, & Ladwig, 2016; Jiang, 2018; Jiang & Probst, 2017; Kim & Kim, 2018). It also influences their attitudes towards work and the organization, which, if neglected, may be detrimental to the organization.…”