1959
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9112/10/3/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Riddle of Relativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electromagnetic energy argument. This argument is supported by the careful analyses of E. G. Cull wick [15]. He applied the electrokinetic theory of Maxwell which predicts that the energy of a magnetic field is related to the energy in the current driving the magnetic field.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The electromagnetic energy argument. This argument is supported by the careful analyses of E. G. Cull wick [15]. He applied the electrokinetic theory of Maxwell which predicts that the energy of a magnetic field is related to the energy in the current driving the magnetic field.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that all equations where ∇ appears in the present note are valid in arbitrary orthogonal curvilinear coordinates (cf Redžić 2001, Višňovský 2004, Redžić 2005). 4 In this context it is perhaps worthwhile to mention that Gelman (1991), in his interesting relativistic analysis of Faraday's law via dyadics, essentially revitalized Silberstein's 'stretchers' (cf Silberstein 1914and Cullwick 1959, but also Møller 1972and Frahm 1979).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the relations P = ε 0 (ε r − 1)E and M = 0 (the conductor is linear, isotropic and non-magnetic!) and using the relations between the unprimed and primed variables of special relativity (see, for example, Rosser (1964), Cullwick (1959)) one gets surprisingly simple expressions for P and M :…”
Section: Maxwell's Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard procedure that was used above for finding the constitutive equations for P and M in the laboratory reference frame was criticized by Pellegrini and Swift (1995) in a different context, in their re-evaluation of the classic 1913 experiment of Wilson and Wilson (see also Cullwick (1959)). It appears, however, that the critique has been refuted (Burrows 1997, Ridgely 1999.…”
Section: Maxwell's Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation