“…Consistent with this, the presence of dnaA defective alleles, dnaA(Sx), suppresses the detrimental effect on DNA replication observed in mutants that have problems with the progression of forks due to the presence of defective subunits of DNA polymerase III coded by the dnaX gene (Gines-Candelaria et al, 1995;Blinkova et al, 2003;Skovgaard & Lobner-Olesen 2005). Furthermore, a lower availability of wild type DnaA protein induced by the presence of extra copies of the datA sequence alleviates replication problems in both the dnaX (Skovgaard & Lobner-Olesen, 2005) and the nrdA101 mutant (this work), whilst initiation defects caused by deletion of DnaA box R4 suppress replication elongation defects (Stepankiw et al, 2009). These observations, together with our data, are consistent with the idea that the progression of replication forks is not merely responsive to elongation factors (dNTP pools or proteins engaged in elongation) but also to the number of forks running along the chromosome.…”